Effect of Additional Buoyancy Swimsuits on Performance of Competitive Swimmers

Q3 Health Professions
S. Moriyama, Yasunori Watanabe, Tsubasa Kurono, J. Morais, D. Marinho, K. Wakayoshi
{"title":"Effect of Additional Buoyancy Swimsuits on Performance of Competitive Swimmers","authors":"S. Moriyama, Yasunori Watanabe, Tsubasa Kurono, J. Morais, D. Marinho, K. Wakayoshi","doi":"10.2174/1875399x02114010098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n When in water, the Centers of Buoyancy (CoB) and Mass (CoM) of the human body are positioned cranially and caudally, respectively. With increasing distance between these centers, the sinking torque of the lower limbs increases, with a subsequent decrease in swimming performance due to increased drag.\n \n \n \n To clarify the effect of additional buoyancy swimsuits on swimming performance.\n \n \n \n The subjects were eight competitive male swimmers of mean ±SD age 21±2 years. Swimming performance was compared between Conventional (CS) and Additional Buoyancy Swimsuits (ABS). CoM and CoB were identified on land and in water, respectively, with the swimmers maintaining a horizontal posture. CoM was measured by the reaction board method. CoB was calculated as the force exerted in the vertical direction accompanied by changes in inspiratory volume. Swimming velocity and Blood Lactate (BL) concentration value during 200 m front crawl in trials at four different speeds (curve test) were recorded as swimming performance.\n \n \n \n No significant difference in inspiratory volume was observed between CS and ABS (small effect size, d=0.28). The distance between CoM and CoB was significantly shorter for CS than ABS (p < 0.001; large effect size, d=1.08). Both swimming velocity at BL of 4 mmol·L-1 and maximal effort were significantly faster for ABS (p < 0.042; 0.008), with large effect size (d=0.91; 0.98). However, there was no significant difference in maximal BL between CS and ABS (small effect size, d=0.37).\n \n \n \n ABS improves swimming performance by streamlining the horizontal posture.\n","PeriodicalId":38865,"journal":{"name":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x02114010098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When in water, the Centers of Buoyancy (CoB) and Mass (CoM) of the human body are positioned cranially and caudally, respectively. With increasing distance between these centers, the sinking torque of the lower limbs increases, with a subsequent decrease in swimming performance due to increased drag. To clarify the effect of additional buoyancy swimsuits on swimming performance. The subjects were eight competitive male swimmers of mean ±SD age 21±2 years. Swimming performance was compared between Conventional (CS) and Additional Buoyancy Swimsuits (ABS). CoM and CoB were identified on land and in water, respectively, with the swimmers maintaining a horizontal posture. CoM was measured by the reaction board method. CoB was calculated as the force exerted in the vertical direction accompanied by changes in inspiratory volume. Swimming velocity and Blood Lactate (BL) concentration value during 200 m front crawl in trials at four different speeds (curve test) were recorded as swimming performance. No significant difference in inspiratory volume was observed between CS and ABS (small effect size, d=0.28). The distance between CoM and CoB was significantly shorter for CS than ABS (p < 0.001; large effect size, d=1.08). Both swimming velocity at BL of 4 mmol·L-1 and maximal effort were significantly faster for ABS (p < 0.042; 0.008), with large effect size (d=0.91; 0.98). However, there was no significant difference in maximal BL between CS and ABS (small effect size, d=0.37). ABS improves swimming performance by streamlining the horizontal posture.
附加浮力泳装对竞技游泳运动员成绩的影响
在水中,人体的浮力中心(CoB)和质心(CoM)分别位于头部和尾部。随着这些中心之间的距离增加,下肢的下沉力矩增加,由于阻力增加,游泳性能随之下降。阐明附加浮力对游泳性能的影响。研究对象为8名男性游泳运动员,平均±SD年龄21±2岁。比较了常规(CS)和附加浮力泳衣(ABS)的游泳性能。当游泳者保持水平姿势时,分别在陆地和水中识别出CoM和CoB。CoM采用反应板法测定。CoB计算为垂直方向施加的力随吸气量的变化。记录4种不同速度(曲线试验)下200米爬泳时的游泳速度和血乳酸(BL)浓度值作为游泳成绩。吸入量在CS和ABS之间无显著差异(小效应量,d=0.28)。CS与CoB之间的距离显著短于ABS (p < 0.001;大效应量,d=1.08)。4 mmol·L-1时,ABS的游泳速度和最大努力均显著快于前者(p < 0.042;0.008),效应量大(d=0.91;0.98)。然而,CS与ABS的最大BL无显著差异(小效应量,d=0.37)。ABS通过流线型水平姿势提高游泳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Sports Sciences Journal
Open Sports Sciences Journal Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信