Troubling ambulant research: Disabled people's socio-spatial encounters with urban un/safety and the politics of mobile methods

Q2 Social Sciences
Claire Edwards, Nicola Maxwell
{"title":"Troubling ambulant research: Disabled people's socio-spatial encounters with urban un/safety and the politics of mobile methods","authors":"Claire Edwards, Nicola Maxwell","doi":"10.1177/07916035221098601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a critical reflection on the use of walking and mobile interviews in the context of research with disabled people whose diverse corporealities and cognitions challenge assumptions about walking as a normative bodily act associated with free, autonomous, mobility. While it has been suggested that mobile methods hold out the potential to open up dialogic and participative spaces of inquiry that capture embodied, affectual, and sensory knowledges in place, there has been less discussion of how social and bodily difference shapes the politics and practices of methods on the move. Drawing on research exploring disabled people's socio-spatial knowledges and experiences of urban un/safety in Ireland, we address this lacuna by reflecting on our use of ‘go-along’ interviews with people with diverse impairments and mobilities. Recognising the barriers that mediate disabled people's use of urban space, we interrogate both what go-along interviews can contribute to our understanding of disabled people's embodied encounters with urban un/safety, but also the limits, challenges and politics of mobile interviews as a form of methodological practice. We suggest there is a need to advance interdisciplinary social science scholarship which troubles ambulant research, and writes social and bodily difference into mobility studies and mobile methods.","PeriodicalId":52497,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Sociology","volume":"31 1","pages":"63 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07916035221098601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper offers a critical reflection on the use of walking and mobile interviews in the context of research with disabled people whose diverse corporealities and cognitions challenge assumptions about walking as a normative bodily act associated with free, autonomous, mobility. While it has been suggested that mobile methods hold out the potential to open up dialogic and participative spaces of inquiry that capture embodied, affectual, and sensory knowledges in place, there has been less discussion of how social and bodily difference shapes the politics and practices of methods on the move. Drawing on research exploring disabled people's socio-spatial knowledges and experiences of urban un/safety in Ireland, we address this lacuna by reflecting on our use of ‘go-along’ interviews with people with diverse impairments and mobilities. Recognising the barriers that mediate disabled people's use of urban space, we interrogate both what go-along interviews can contribute to our understanding of disabled people's embodied encounters with urban un/safety, but also the limits, challenges and politics of mobile interviews as a form of methodological practice. We suggest there is a need to advance interdisciplinary social science scholarship which troubles ambulant research, and writes social and bodily difference into mobility studies and mobile methods.
艰难的流动研究:残疾人与城市不安全的社会空间遭遇和流动方法的政治
本文对在研究残疾人的背景下使用步行和移动采访进行了批判性反思,这些残疾人的不同身体素质和认知挑战了关于步行是一种与自由、自主和行动相关的规范身体行为的假设。虽然有人认为,移动方法有可能打开对话和参与的探究空间,捕捉具体的、做作的和感官的知识,但关于社会和身体差异如何塑造移动方法的政治和实践的讨论较少。根据对爱尔兰残疾人在城市不安全方面的社会空间知识和经验的研究,我们通过反思我们对不同残疾和行动能力的人的“同行”采访来解决这一空白。认识到介导残疾人使用城市空间的障碍,我们询问了哪些后续采访有助于我们理解残疾人与城市不安全的具体遭遇,以及移动采访作为一种方法论实践形式的局限性、挑战和政治性。我们建议有必要推进跨学科的社会科学学术,这给流动性研究带来了麻烦,并将社会和身体差异写入流动性研究和流动方法中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Journal of Sociology
Irish Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书