Verdinglichung und Zerstörung. Günther Anders und der Begriff der Geschichte im Jahr 1941

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naharaim Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1515/naha-2018-0100
Anna Pollmann
{"title":"Verdinglichung und Zerstörung. Günther Anders und der Begriff der Geschichte im Jahr 1941","authors":"Anna Pollmann","doi":"10.1515/naha-2018-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article discusses the transformation of the concept of History as it can be traced in the writings of Günther Anders. Anders is primarily known as a critique of modern technology specifically of the atomic bomb, which made him a mentor for the first anti-nuclear movement in West-Germany in the late 1950s. His historical thinking was therefore mainly perceived in its post-historic and apocalyptic dimensions. A closer look at his earlier writings reveals not only that his questioning of the modern concept of History began long before the “ontological cesura” of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The article discusses two unpublished philosophical manuscripts as well as passages from his Californian diaries, both dating from 1940/41 and focussing the concept of progress. To follow his thoughts from two different angles – historical philosophical inquiry (however fragmented) and the literary form of his diary – gives us insight in his specific methodology of writing coined “Gelegenheitsphilosophie”. This specific form between “journalism and metaphysics” enables Anders to review abstract philosophical concepts on the basis of everyday observation. In the crucial year 1941 Anders reviews progress-thought from the perspective of a Hollywood film studio, raising questions of tradition, authenticity and technological progress in cultural production.","PeriodicalId":40309,"journal":{"name":"Naharaim","volume":"13 1","pages":"117 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/naha-2018-0100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naharaim","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/naha-2018-0100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The article discusses the transformation of the concept of History as it can be traced in the writings of Günther Anders. Anders is primarily known as a critique of modern technology specifically of the atomic bomb, which made him a mentor for the first anti-nuclear movement in West-Germany in the late 1950s. His historical thinking was therefore mainly perceived in its post-historic and apocalyptic dimensions. A closer look at his earlier writings reveals not only that his questioning of the modern concept of History began long before the “ontological cesura” of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The article discusses two unpublished philosophical manuscripts as well as passages from his Californian diaries, both dating from 1940/41 and focussing the concept of progress. To follow his thoughts from two different angles – historical philosophical inquiry (however fragmented) and the literary form of his diary – gives us insight in his specific methodology of writing coined “Gelegenheitsphilosophie”. This specific form between “journalism and metaphysics” enables Anders to review abstract philosophical concepts on the basis of everyday observation. In the crucial year 1941 Anders reviews progress-thought from the perspective of a Hollywood film studio, raising questions of tradition, authenticity and technological progress in cultural production.
统治和毁灭。Günther Anders与1941年的历史观
摘要本文探讨了安德斯(gantur Anders)著作中历史概念的转变。安德斯主要以批评现代技术,特别是原子弹而闻名,这使他成为20世纪50年代末西德第一次反核运动的导师。因此,他的历史思想主要体现在后历史和启示的维度上。仔细研究他早期的著作,不仅可以发现他对现代历史概念的质疑早在广岛和长崎的“本体论的死亡”之前就开始了。这篇文章讨论了两份未发表的哲学手稿,以及他在加州的日记中的段落,都可以追溯到1940/41年,关注的是进步的概念。从两个不同的角度——历史哲学探究(尽管支离破碎)和他日记的文学形式——来跟随他的思想,我们可以洞察他被称为“哲学哲学”的具体写作方法。这种“新闻与形而上学”之间的特殊形式,使安德斯能够在日常观察的基础上对抽象的哲学概念进行审视。在关键的1941年,安德斯从好莱坞电影制片厂的角度审视了进步思想,提出了文化生产中的传统、真实性和技术进步的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Naharaim
Naharaim HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书