Bank crisis resolution in India

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Soumik Bhusan, Ajit Dayanandan, N. Gopal
{"title":"Bank crisis resolution in India","authors":"Soumik Bhusan, Ajit Dayanandan, N. Gopal","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-02-2023-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe academic literature has examined why bank runs happen based on the work of 2022 Nobel Prize-winning economists Diamond and Dybvig. They have found the source of banking/financial crisis in terms of mismatch between liabilities (deposits being short term and savers wanting to short-term access to their money) and assets (long term and illiquid). The Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) crisis intensified when it came under Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). This situation provides the opportunity to study whether the elements embodied in the theoretical models like Diamond and Dybvig hold true for LVB crisis. This study aims to examine the reasons for the demise of LVB in India using DuPont financial model, peer group analysis and time series structural break in crucial financial parameters.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study examines the reason for insolvency of LVB using financial ratios, financial models (DuPont), financial distress model (Z-score) and asset-liability management. The study also adopts univariate structural break models using quarterly financial data covering the key financial measures used in the RBI’s PCA framework.\n\n\nFindings\nLVB crisis is like Diamond–Dybvig model, in the sense, savers requiring short-term access to their money (liquidity for their deposits) on the information of high non-performing assets, which further deteriorates the illiquid nature of loan portfolio (assets) of banks. The study finds its profit margin (net interest margin and non-interest margin) and managerial efficiency had started deteriorating since 2018. The study finds that LVB’s main weakness lies in its limited credit appraisal ability, its monitoring and weak internal controls. Lending to sensitive sectors (like real estate, capital markets and commodities) and exposure to large business groups also contributed to its weakness. The study also finds huge, elevated asset-liability mismatch, especially in the short-term maturity buckets. Using univariate econometric time series model, the study also confirms financial weakness being evident much earlier than the time when resolution was undertaken by the RBI through PCA.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study has implications for analysing and monitoring financial distress of banks. The study also has implications for devising banking regulation and supervision.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study brings in a perspective of the banking regulations using the application of PCA framework on a listed private sector bank. The authors combine an accounting ratio model and combine risk measures that could identify the incipient risks in a bank. The authors believe this will help in refinement of banking regulations and better monitoring mechanisms.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-02-2023-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The academic literature has examined why bank runs happen based on the work of 2022 Nobel Prize-winning economists Diamond and Dybvig. They have found the source of banking/financial crisis in terms of mismatch between liabilities (deposits being short term and savers wanting to short-term access to their money) and assets (long term and illiquid). The Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB) crisis intensified when it came under Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). This situation provides the opportunity to study whether the elements embodied in the theoretical models like Diamond and Dybvig hold true for LVB crisis. This study aims to examine the reasons for the demise of LVB in India using DuPont financial model, peer group analysis and time series structural break in crucial financial parameters. Design/methodology/approach The study examines the reason for insolvency of LVB using financial ratios, financial models (DuPont), financial distress model (Z-score) and asset-liability management. The study also adopts univariate structural break models using quarterly financial data covering the key financial measures used in the RBI’s PCA framework. Findings LVB crisis is like Diamond–Dybvig model, in the sense, savers requiring short-term access to their money (liquidity for their deposits) on the information of high non-performing assets, which further deteriorates the illiquid nature of loan portfolio (assets) of banks. The study finds its profit margin (net interest margin and non-interest margin) and managerial efficiency had started deteriorating since 2018. The study finds that LVB’s main weakness lies in its limited credit appraisal ability, its monitoring and weak internal controls. Lending to sensitive sectors (like real estate, capital markets and commodities) and exposure to large business groups also contributed to its weakness. The study also finds huge, elevated asset-liability mismatch, especially in the short-term maturity buckets. Using univariate econometric time series model, the study also confirms financial weakness being evident much earlier than the time when resolution was undertaken by the RBI through PCA. Research limitations/implications The study has implications for analysing and monitoring financial distress of banks. The study also has implications for devising banking regulation and supervision. Originality/value The study brings in a perspective of the banking regulations using the application of PCA framework on a listed private sector bank. The authors combine an accounting ratio model and combine risk measures that could identify the incipient risks in a bank. The authors believe this will help in refinement of banking regulations and better monitoring mechanisms.
印度银行危机解决方案
学术文献基于2022年诺贝尔经济学奖得主戴蒙德和迪布维格的研究,研究了银行挤兑发生的原因。他们发现,银行/金融危机的根源在于负债(存款是短期的,储户希望短期获得资金)和资产(长期的,非流动性的)之间的不匹配。拉克希米维拉斯银行(LVB)危机在印度储备银行(RBI)的快速纠正行动(PCA)下加剧。这种情况为研究Diamond和Dybvig等理论模型中体现的要素是否适用于LVB危机提供了机会。本研究旨在利用杜邦财务模型、同行群体分析和关键财务参数的时间序列结构断裂来研究印度LVB消亡的原因。设计/方法/方法本研究使用财务比率、财务模型(杜邦)、财务困境模型(Z-score)和资产负债管理来检验LVB破产的原因。该研究还采用单变量结构断裂模型,使用季度财务数据,涵盖印度储备银行PCA框架中使用的关键财务指标。发现slvb危机与Diamond-Dybvig模型相似,储户根据高不良资产的信息需要短期获得资金(存款的流动性),这进一步恶化了银行贷款组合(资产)的非流动性。该研究发现,自2018年以来,其利润率(净息差和非息差)和管理效率开始恶化。研究发现,LVB的主要弱点在于其信用评估能力有限,监控和内部控制薄弱。对敏感行业(如房地产、资本市场和大宗商品)的贷款,以及对大型企业集团的敞口,也导致了中国银行的疲软。研究还发现,资产负债错配严重加剧,尤其是在短期期限方面。使用单变量计量经济时间序列模型,该研究还证实,在印度储备银行通过PCA进行解决的时间之前,财政弱点就很明显。研究的局限性/启示本研究对分析和监测银行的财务困境具有启示意义。这项研究对制定银行监管也有启示意义。原创性/价值本研究将PCA框架应用于一家上市私营银行,从银行监管的角度进行研究。作者结合会计比率模型和组合风险指标,可以识别银行的早期风险。作者认为,这将有助于完善银行监管和更好的监督机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信