Syrian refugees to Europe: are they different from the non-Syrians?

IF 0.9 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Ruya Karci, N. Dogan, M. Hakan Berument
{"title":"Syrian refugees to Europe: are they different from the non-Syrians?","authors":"Ruya Karci, N. Dogan, M. Hakan Berument","doi":"10.1080/17938120.2022.2138614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The conflict and violence in the Syrian Arab Republic have led to an increase in Syrians seeking asylum in European countries. In this study, asylum applications of Syrian refugees to European countries are examined, taking into account the geographical neighborhood effects, with annual data for the time period from 2009 to 2018. This paper also aims to compare asylum applications of Syrian to non-Syrian refugees. The estimation results suggest that positive previous asylum application decisions by the corresponding countries have explanatory power on asylum applications of Syrian and non-Syrian refugees. Economic conditions impact on asylum applications of non-Syrian refugees, while similar statistical evidence cannot be found for Syrian refugees. The empirical evidence from Syrian refugees also indicates a positive geographical neighborhood effect, which suggests that the relationship is stronger in countries that are closer to each other. However, the findings from non-Syrian refugees do not indicate that neighboring observations affect one another. Overall, this suggests that Syrian refugees do not move according to economic incentives but with previous asylum applications that resulted in positive and asylum applications in neighboring countries.","PeriodicalId":43862,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Development Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2022.2138614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The conflict and violence in the Syrian Arab Republic have led to an increase in Syrians seeking asylum in European countries. In this study, asylum applications of Syrian refugees to European countries are examined, taking into account the geographical neighborhood effects, with annual data for the time period from 2009 to 2018. This paper also aims to compare asylum applications of Syrian to non-Syrian refugees. The estimation results suggest that positive previous asylum application decisions by the corresponding countries have explanatory power on asylum applications of Syrian and non-Syrian refugees. Economic conditions impact on asylum applications of non-Syrian refugees, while similar statistical evidence cannot be found for Syrian refugees. The empirical evidence from Syrian refugees also indicates a positive geographical neighborhood effect, which suggests that the relationship is stronger in countries that are closer to each other. However, the findings from non-Syrian refugees do not indicate that neighboring observations affect one another. Overall, this suggests that Syrian refugees do not move according to economic incentives but with previous asylum applications that resulted in positive and asylum applications in neighboring countries.
前往欧洲的叙利亚难民:他们与非叙利亚人不同吗?
摘要阿拉伯叙利亚共和国的冲突和暴力导致在欧洲国家寻求庇护的叙利亚人增加。在这项研究中,考虑到地理邻近效应,使用2009年至2018年期间的年度数据,对叙利亚难民向欧洲国家提出的庇护申请进行了审查。本文还旨在比较叙利亚难民和非叙利亚难民的庇护申请。估计结果表明,相应国家先前的积极庇护申请决定对叙利亚和非叙利亚难民的庇护申请具有解释力。经济条件对非叙利亚难民的庇护申请产生影响,而叙利亚难民却找不到类似的统计证据。来自叙利亚难民的经验证据也表明了积极的地理邻居效应,这表明在彼此更亲近的国家,这种关系更牢固。然而,非叙利亚难民的调查结果并不表明邻国的观察结果会相互影响。总的来说,这表明叙利亚难民并不是根据经济激励而迁移的,而是根据之前的庇护申请而迁移的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Middle East Development Journal
Middle East Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信