The effects of operator position and superfluous brackets on student performance in simple arithmetic

Q2 Mathematics
Vy-Vy Ngo, Luisa Perez Lacera, A. Closser, Erin Ottmar
{"title":"The effects of operator position and superfluous brackets on student performance in simple arithmetic","authors":"Vy-Vy Ngo, Luisa Perez Lacera, A. Closser, Erin Ottmar","doi":"10.5964/jnc.9535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For students to advance beyond arithmetic, they must learn how to attend to the structure of math notation. This process can be challenging due to students' left-to-right computing tendencies. Brackets are used in mathematics to indicate precedence but can also be used as superfluous cues and perceptual grouping mechanisms in instructional materials to direct students’ attention and facilitate accurate and efficient problem solving. This online study examines the impact of operator position and superfluous brackets on students’ performance solving arithmetic problems. A total of 528 students completed a baseline assessment of math knowledge, then were randomly assigned to one of six conditions that varied in the placement of higher-order operator and the presence or absence of superfluous brackets: [a] brackets-left (e.g., (5 * 4) + 2 + 3), [b] no brackets-left (e.g., 5 * 4 + 2 + 3), [c] brackets-center (e.g., 2 + (5 * 4) + 3), [d] no brackets-center (e.g., 2 + 5 * 4 + 3), [e] brackets-right (e.g., 2 + 3 + (5 * 4)), and [f] no brackets-right (e.g., 2 + 3 + 5 * 4). Participants simplified expressions in an online learning platform with the goal to “master” the content by answering three questions correctly in a row. Results showed that, on average, students were more accurate in problem solving when the higher-order operator was on the left side and less accurate when it was on the right compared to in the center. There was also a main effect of the presence of brackets on mastery speed. However, interaction effects showed that these main effects were driven by the center position: superfluous brackets only improved accuracy when students solved expressions with brackets with the operator in the center. This study advances research on perceptual learning in math by revealing how operator position and presence of superfluous brackets impact students’ performance. Additionally, this research provides implications for instructors who can use perceptual cues to support students during problem solving.","PeriodicalId":36632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Numerical Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.9535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For students to advance beyond arithmetic, they must learn how to attend to the structure of math notation. This process can be challenging due to students' left-to-right computing tendencies. Brackets are used in mathematics to indicate precedence but can also be used as superfluous cues and perceptual grouping mechanisms in instructional materials to direct students’ attention and facilitate accurate and efficient problem solving. This online study examines the impact of operator position and superfluous brackets on students’ performance solving arithmetic problems. A total of 528 students completed a baseline assessment of math knowledge, then were randomly assigned to one of six conditions that varied in the placement of higher-order operator and the presence or absence of superfluous brackets: [a] brackets-left (e.g., (5 * 4) + 2 + 3), [b] no brackets-left (e.g., 5 * 4 + 2 + 3), [c] brackets-center (e.g., 2 + (5 * 4) + 3), [d] no brackets-center (e.g., 2 + 5 * 4 + 3), [e] brackets-right (e.g., 2 + 3 + (5 * 4)), and [f] no brackets-right (e.g., 2 + 3 + 5 * 4). Participants simplified expressions in an online learning platform with the goal to “master” the content by answering three questions correctly in a row. Results showed that, on average, students were more accurate in problem solving when the higher-order operator was on the left side and less accurate when it was on the right compared to in the center. There was also a main effect of the presence of brackets on mastery speed. However, interaction effects showed that these main effects were driven by the center position: superfluous brackets only improved accuracy when students solved expressions with brackets with the operator in the center. This study advances research on perceptual learning in math by revealing how operator position and presence of superfluous brackets impact students’ performance. Additionally, this research provides implications for instructors who can use perceptual cues to support students during problem solving.
运算符位置和多余括号对学生简单算术成绩的影响
为了让学生超越算术,他们必须学会如何注意数学符号的结构。由于学生从左到右的计算倾向,这个过程可能具有挑战性。括号在数学中用于表示优先级,但在教学材料中也可以用作多余的线索和感知分组机制,以引导学生的注意力,促进准确高效的问题解决。这项在线研究考察了运算符位置和多余括号对学生解决算术问题表现的影响。共有528名学生完成了数学知识的基线评估,然后被随机分配到六个条件中的一个,这些条件在高阶算子的位置和是否存在多余的括号方面有所不同:[A]左括号(例如,(5*4)+2+3),[b]没有左括号(如,5*4+2+3),[d]没有括号居中(例如2+5*4+3),[e]括号向右(例如2+3+(5*4)),以及[f]没有括号向右(如2+3+5*4。参与者在在线学习平台上简化了表达,目的是通过连续正确回答三个问题来“掌握”内容。结果表明,与中心算子相比,平均而言,当高阶算子在左侧时,学生在解决问题时更准确,而当算子在右侧时,学生的准确度更低。括号的存在对掌握速度也有主要影响。然而,交互效应表明,这些主要效应是由中心位置驱动的:当学生在中心位置用括号求解表达式时,多余的括号只会提高准确性。本研究通过揭示运算符位置和多余括号的存在如何影响学生的表现,推进了数学感知学习的研究。此外,这项研究为教师提供了启示,他们可以在解决问题的过程中使用感知线索来支持学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Numerical Cognition
Journal of Numerical Cognition Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信