Unity of tradition and innovation as a sustainable development factor of digital society

Yu. A. Chernavin
{"title":"Unity of tradition and innovation as a sustainable development factor of digital society","authors":"Yu. A. Chernavin","doi":"10.26425/2658-347x-2023-6-1-21-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Against the background of many complex problems threatening the sustainable development of world civilization, the dialectic of tradition and innovation is considered as a pattern of social evolution. The specifics of its implementation are determined by specific historical conditions that allow us to distinguish three stages of development – with the dominance of tradition, the predominance of innovation, the unity of tradition and innovation. The need for such unity in a digital society is due to its characteristics of a “complex society”, a risk society, an increase in the number of social ontologies, and changes in indicators of human subjectivity. The disappearing unambiguity of cause-and-effect relationships, growing social uncertainty create the danger of going off the trajectory of sustainable and effective development, generating the need for a guideline that protects from mistakes. Centuries-old cultural experience, which appears in the modern world as a tradition, can become such a reference point. The mechanism of unity of tradition and innovation is revealed by relying on the structure of spiritual culture, which has a level character and has behavioral, ideological and genetic formations. The realization of their potential is presented as considering the requirements that have developed over thousands of years, and in the form of meanings and archetypes, often inexplicable, but encouraging certain choices and actions. In general, we are talking about the transition from one social type of thinking and activity to another, corresponding to the digital civilization and capable of ensuring the sustainable development of society and the individual.","PeriodicalId":52710,"journal":{"name":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347x-2023-6-1-21-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the background of many complex problems threatening the sustainable development of world civilization, the dialectic of tradition and innovation is considered as a pattern of social evolution. The specifics of its implementation are determined by specific historical conditions that allow us to distinguish three stages of development – with the dominance of tradition, the predominance of innovation, the unity of tradition and innovation. The need for such unity in a digital society is due to its characteristics of a “complex society”, a risk society, an increase in the number of social ontologies, and changes in indicators of human subjectivity. The disappearing unambiguity of cause-and-effect relationships, growing social uncertainty create the danger of going off the trajectory of sustainable and effective development, generating the need for a guideline that protects from mistakes. Centuries-old cultural experience, which appears in the modern world as a tradition, can become such a reference point. The mechanism of unity of tradition and innovation is revealed by relying on the structure of spiritual culture, which has a level character and has behavioral, ideological and genetic formations. The realization of their potential is presented as considering the requirements that have developed over thousands of years, and in the form of meanings and archetypes, often inexplicable, but encouraging certain choices and actions. In general, we are talking about the transition from one social type of thinking and activity to another, corresponding to the digital civilization and capable of ensuring the sustainable development of society and the individual.
传统与创新的统一是数字社会的可持续发展因素
在威胁世界文明可持续发展的许多复杂问题的背景下,传统与创新的辩证法被认为是一种社会进化模式。它的具体实施是由特定的历史条件决定的,这些历史条件使我们能够区分三个发展阶段——传统主导、创新主导、传统与创新相统一。数字社会之所以需要这种统一,是因为它具有“复杂社会”、风险社会、社会本体数量的增加以及人类主体性指标的变化等特点。因果关系的模糊性正在消失,社会不确定性不断增加,这就造成了偏离可持续有效发展轨道的危险,从而需要一个防止错误的指导方针。作为一种传统出现在现代世界的数百年的文化经验可以成为这样一个参考点。传统与创新的统一机制是依托精神文化的结构来揭示的,精神文化具有层次性,具有行为性、思想性和基因性的形成。他们潜力的实现被认为是考虑了数千年来发展起来的需求,并以意义和原型的形式呈现,通常是无法解释的,但鼓励某些选择和行动。总的来说,我们谈论的是从一种社会思维和活动向另一种社会活动的转变,与数字文明相对应,能够确保社会和个人的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信