Scientific Value Weights more than Being Open or Toll Access: An analysis of the OA advantage in Nature and Science

Howell Y. Wang, Shelia X. Wei, Cong Cao, Xianwen Wang, F. Y. Ye
{"title":"Scientific Value Weights more than Being Open or Toll Access: An analysis of the OA advantage in Nature and Science","authors":"Howell Y. Wang, Shelia X. Wei, Cong Cao, Xianwen Wang, F. Y. Ye","doi":"10.2478/jdis-2021-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose We attempt to find out whether OA or TA really affects the dissemination of scientific discoveries. Design/methodology/approach We design the indicators, hot-degree, and R-index to indicate a topic OA or TA advantages. First, according to the OA classification of the Web of Science (WoS), we collect data from the WoS by downloading OA and TA articles, letters, and reviews published in Nature and Science during 2010–2019. These papers are divided into three broad disciplines, namely biomedicine, physics, and others. Then, taking a discipline in a journal and using the classical Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to cluster 100 topics of OA and TA papers respectively, we apply the Pearson correlation coefficient to match the topics of OA and TA, and calculate the hot-degree and R-index of every OA-TA topic pair. Finally, characteristics of the discipline can be presented. In qualitative comparison, we choose some high-quality papers which belong to Nature remarkable papers or Science breakthroughs, and analyze the relations between OA/TA and citation numbers. Findings The result shows that OA hot-degree in biomedicine is significantly greater than that of TA, but significantly less than that of TA in physics. Based on the R-index, it is found that OA advantages exist in biomedicine and TA advantages do in physics. Therefore, the dissemination of average scientific discoveries in all fields is not necessarily affected by OA or TA. However, OA promotes the spread of important scientific discoveries in high-quality papers. Research limitations We lost some citations by ignoring other open sources such as arXiv and bioArxiv. Another limitation came from that Nature employs some strong measures for access-promoting subscription-based articles, on which the boundary between OA and TA became fuzzy. Practical implications It is useful to select hot topics in a set of publications by the hot-degree index. The finding comprehensively reflects the differences of OA and TA in different disciplines, which is a useful reference when researchers choose the publishing way as OA or TA. Originality/value We propose a new method, including two indicators, to explore and measure OA or TA advantages.","PeriodicalId":92237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","volume":"6 1","pages":"62 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of data and information science (Warsaw, Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We attempt to find out whether OA or TA really affects the dissemination of scientific discoveries. Design/methodology/approach We design the indicators, hot-degree, and R-index to indicate a topic OA or TA advantages. First, according to the OA classification of the Web of Science (WoS), we collect data from the WoS by downloading OA and TA articles, letters, and reviews published in Nature and Science during 2010–2019. These papers are divided into three broad disciplines, namely biomedicine, physics, and others. Then, taking a discipline in a journal and using the classical Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to cluster 100 topics of OA and TA papers respectively, we apply the Pearson correlation coefficient to match the topics of OA and TA, and calculate the hot-degree and R-index of every OA-TA topic pair. Finally, characteristics of the discipline can be presented. In qualitative comparison, we choose some high-quality papers which belong to Nature remarkable papers or Science breakthroughs, and analyze the relations between OA/TA and citation numbers. Findings The result shows that OA hot-degree in biomedicine is significantly greater than that of TA, but significantly less than that of TA in physics. Based on the R-index, it is found that OA advantages exist in biomedicine and TA advantages do in physics. Therefore, the dissemination of average scientific discoveries in all fields is not necessarily affected by OA or TA. However, OA promotes the spread of important scientific discoveries in high-quality papers. Research limitations We lost some citations by ignoring other open sources such as arXiv and bioArxiv. Another limitation came from that Nature employs some strong measures for access-promoting subscription-based articles, on which the boundary between OA and TA became fuzzy. Practical implications It is useful to select hot topics in a set of publications by the hot-degree index. The finding comprehensively reflects the differences of OA and TA in different disciplines, which is a useful reference when researchers choose the publishing way as OA or TA. Originality/value We propose a new method, including two indicators, to explore and measure OA or TA advantages.
科学价值比开放和收费更重要:《自然》和《科学》的开放获取优势分析
我们试图找出OA或TA是否真的影响科学发现的传播。设计/方法/方法我们设计了指标、热度和r指数来表明一个主题OA或TA的优势。首先,根据Web of Science (WoS)的OA分类,通过下载2010-2019年发表在《Nature》和《Science》上的OA和TA文章、信函和综述,收集WoS的数据。这些论文分为三个广泛的学科,即生物医学、物理学和其他。然后,以某一期刊的某一学科为例,分别采用经典的潜狄利克雷分配(Latent Dirichlet Allocation, LDA)对OA和TA的100篇论文的主题进行聚类,应用Pearson相关系数对OA和TA的主题进行匹配,计算每个OA-TA主题对的热点度和r指数。最后,提出了该学科的特点。在定性比较中,我们选择了一些属于Nature卓越论文或Science突破的高质量论文,分析了OA/TA与被引数之间的关系。结果表明,生物医学领域OA热度显著大于TA,而物理领域OA热度显著小于TA。基于r指数,发现OA优势存在于生物医学领域,TA优势存在于物理领域。因此,各个领域的平均科学发现的传播并不一定受到OA或TA的影响。然而,OA促进了重要科学发现在高质量论文中的传播。我们忽略了其他开放源代码,如arXiv和bioArxiv,从而丢失了一些引用。另一个限制来自于《自然》采用了一些强有力的措施来促进基于订阅的文章的访问,这使得OA和TA之间的界限变得模糊。应用热点度指数在一组出版物中选择热点话题是有用的。这一发现全面反映了不同学科OA与TA的差异,对研究者选择OA或TA发表方式具有参考价值。我们提出了一种新的方法,包括两个指标,来探索和衡量OA或TA的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信