The effect of motivational interviewing on physical activity level among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION

PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS Pub Date : 2020-02-09 DOI:10.1080/02703181.2020.1725217

O. Akinrolie, Ruth Barclay, S. Strachan, Akanksha Gupta, U. Jasper, Samuel U. Jumbo, N. Askin, R. Rabbani, R. Zarychanski, A. Abou-Setta

{"title":"The effect of motivational interviewing on physical activity level among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"O. Akinrolie, Ruth Barclay, S. Strachan, Akanksha Gupta, U. Jasper, Samuel U. Jumbo, N. Askin, R. Rabbani, R. Zarychanski, A. Abou-Setta","doi":"10.1080/02703181.2020.1725217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim: To determine the reported effect of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using Motivational Interviewing (MI) to advance physical activity among older adults. Methods: We searched for RCTs in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library from inception until March, 2019. Identified trials that used MI for improving physical activity in community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). Results: From 5616 citations identified from the search, we included three trials (four publications). There was no evidence of a significant difference between the effect of MI and usual care on physical activity in older adults (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.02, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.46, I2 16%; 3 trials; 84 participants). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to support the effect of MI on improving physical activity among older adults. There is a need for more high quality trials to show that MI is beneficial in older adults who are physically inactive.","PeriodicalId":45387,"journal":{"name":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02703181.2020.1725217","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703181.2020.1725217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Aim: To determine the reported effect of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using Motivational Interviewing (MI) to advance physical activity among older adults. Methods: We searched for RCTs in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AgeLine, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library from inception until March, 2019. Identified trials that used MI for improving physical activity in community-dwelling older adults (≥65 years). Results: From 5616 citations identified from the search, we included three trials (four publications). There was no evidence of a significant difference between the effect of MI and usual care on physical activity in older adults (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.02, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.46, I2 16%; 3 trials; 84 participants). Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to support the effect of MI on improving physical activity among older adults. There is a need for more high quality trials to show that MI is beneficial in older adults who are physically inactive.

查看原文本刊更多论文

动机访谈对老年人体育活动水平的影响：系统综述和荟萃分析

摘要目的:探讨采用动机访谈法(MI)促进老年人身体活动的随机对照试验(RCTs)的效果。方法:在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、AgeLine、PsycINFO和Cochrane Library中检索自成立至2019年3月的随机对照试验。确定了使用心肌梗死改善社区居住老年人(≥65岁)身体活动的试验。结果:从检索到的5616篇引文中，我们纳入了3篇试验(4篇出版物)。没有证据表明心肌梗死和常规护理对老年人身体活动的影响有显著差异(标准平均差(SMD) -0.02, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.05 ~ 0.46, I2 16%;3试验;84名参与者)。结论:没有足够的证据支持心肌梗死对改善老年人身体活动的影响。需要更多高质量的试验来证明心肌梗死对缺乏运动的老年人有益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN GERIATRICS REHABILITATION-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This comprehensive journal is recognized for its useful balance of research and clinical practice articles. For more than twenty five years Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics has functioned as a forum for allied health professionals as well as others with a focus on rehabilitation of the geriatric client to share information, clinical experience, research, and therapeutic practice. Each issue focuses on current practice and emerging issues in the care of the older client, including rehabilitation and long-term care in institutional and community settings, and innovative programming; the entire range of problems experienced by the elderly; and the current skills needed for working with older clients.