Method validation for the determination of fraction of modern (F14C) in wood samples using conventional method

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
R. Baydoun, O. Samad, B. Nsouli, G. Younes
{"title":"Method validation for the determination of fraction of modern (F14C) in wood samples using conventional method","authors":"R. Baydoun, O. Samad, B. Nsouli, G. Younes","doi":"10.1515/geochr-2015-0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The radiocarbon laboratory at the Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission is undertaking environmental studies, in order to determine the anthropogenic impact of technologies on the ecosystem through the determination of radiocarbon content in tree leaves and plants. Thus, it was important to validate the method used to demonstrate that the applied procedure gives reliable results. Method validation is universally applied in analytical laboratories as an essential part of quality assurance system and as a basic technical requirement of the ISO 17025 standard. The conventional method used for determination of Fraction Modern (F14C) is a standard method issued by the American Society for Testing and Materials in 2011 with a code ASTM-D 6866-11 Method C. According to Eurachem guide, internal validation was expressed in terms of accuracy that was evaluated by trueness and precision. Trueness was expressed in terms of relative bias, while for precision ten consecutive replicates were carried out to under repeatability conditions and five duplicates were analyzed under reproducibility conditions. The limit of detection and the minimum detectable activity (MDA) were calculated. Uncertainty sources were defined and their relative standard uncertainties were calculated in order to determine the combined standard uncertainty. Five reference samples of different matrices were analyzed; calculated z score values were acceptable as being between –2 and +2. The calculation and results are presented in this work.","PeriodicalId":50421,"journal":{"name":"Geochronometria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronometria","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/geochr-2015-0080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The radiocarbon laboratory at the Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission is undertaking environmental studies, in order to determine the anthropogenic impact of technologies on the ecosystem through the determination of radiocarbon content in tree leaves and plants. Thus, it was important to validate the method used to demonstrate that the applied procedure gives reliable results. Method validation is universally applied in analytical laboratories as an essential part of quality assurance system and as a basic technical requirement of the ISO 17025 standard. The conventional method used for determination of Fraction Modern (F14C) is a standard method issued by the American Society for Testing and Materials in 2011 with a code ASTM-D 6866-11 Method C. According to Eurachem guide, internal validation was expressed in terms of accuracy that was evaluated by trueness and precision. Trueness was expressed in terms of relative bias, while for precision ten consecutive replicates were carried out to under repeatability conditions and five duplicates were analyzed under reproducibility conditions. The limit of detection and the minimum detectable activity (MDA) were calculated. Uncertainty sources were defined and their relative standard uncertainties were calculated in order to determine the combined standard uncertainty. Five reference samples of different matrices were analyzed; calculated z score values were acceptable as being between –2 and +2. The calculation and results are presented in this work.
用常规方法测定木材样品中现代(F14C)成分的方法验证
摘要黎巴嫩原子能委员会的放射性碳实验室正在进行环境研究,以便通过测定树叶和植物中的放射性碳含量来确定技术对生态系统的人为影响。因此,重要的是要验证所用的方法,以证明所应用的程序给出了可靠的结果。方法验证作为质量保证体系的重要组成部分和ISO 17025标准的基本技术要求,在分析实验室中普遍应用。用于测定现代馏分(F14C)的传统方法是美国材料与试验学会于2011年发布的标准方法,代码为ASTM-D 6866-11方法C。根据Eurachem指南,内部验证以准确性表示,并通过真实性和精密度进行评估。真实性用相对偏差表示,而对于精度,在重复性条件下进行了十次连续重复,在再现性条件下分析了五次重复。计算检测限和最低可检测活性(MDA)。定义了不确定度来源,并计算了它们的相对标准不确定度,以确定组合标准不确定性。分析了五个不同基质的参考样品;计算出的z分值在-2和+2之间是可以接受的。文中给出了计算结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geochronometria
Geochronometria 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochronometria is aimed at integrating scientists developing different methods of absolute chronology and using them in different fields of earth and other natural sciences and archaeology. The methods in use are e.g. radiocarbon, stable isotopes, isotopes of natural decay series, optically stimulated luminescence, thermoluminescence, EPR/ESR, dendrochronology, varve chronology. The journal publishes papers that are devoted to developing the dating methods as well as studies concentrating on their applications in geology, palaeoclimatology, palaeobiology, palaeohydrology, geocgraphy and archaeology etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信