Introduction of multicenter design in the non-clinical phase to overcome translational barriers in clinical trials

I. G. Murazov, M. Kovaleva, M. Makarova, V. Makarov
{"title":"Introduction of multicenter design in the non-clinical phase to overcome translational barriers in clinical trials","authors":"I. G. Murazov, M. Kovaleva, M. Makarova, V. Makarov","doi":"10.18705/2311-4495-2023-10-1-52-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The translating of individual preclinical studies (PCTs) results into clinical practice is accompanied by a significant number of failures and is associated with significant time and financial costs. The unsatisfactory design of individual non-clinical studies and the reports submitted after having done in vivo experiments at one laboratories do not allow overcoming translational barriers and increasing the results reproducibility. To conduct multicenter non-clinical trials is relevant to to confirm the effectiveness of medicines and increase the chances of successful translation of non-clinical results into clinical practice.Objective. To analyze the scientific literature devoted to multicenter non-clinical studies in the research of the pharmacological activity of new drugs.Design and methods. The research was done using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The review included available publications as of October 16, 2022.Results. It was discovered that single-center studies did not allow predicting the magnitude of the effect accurately, and large sample sizes made the estimation of the magnitude of the effect even less precise.Conclusions. The main purpose of multicenter non-clinical studies rather should be assessing the direction of the effect, including its “stability”, as well as to identify sources of heterogeneity between studies conducted in different laboratories (centers) than performing a quantitative assessment of the effect on several laboratories, as it tend to be in foreign non-clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":89863,"journal":{"name":"Translational medicine (Sunnyvale, Calif.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational medicine (Sunnyvale, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2023-10-1-52-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The translating of individual preclinical studies (PCTs) results into clinical practice is accompanied by a significant number of failures and is associated with significant time and financial costs. The unsatisfactory design of individual non-clinical studies and the reports submitted after having done in vivo experiments at one laboratories do not allow overcoming translational barriers and increasing the results reproducibility. To conduct multicenter non-clinical trials is relevant to to confirm the effectiveness of medicines and increase the chances of successful translation of non-clinical results into clinical practice.Objective. To analyze the scientific literature devoted to multicenter non-clinical studies in the research of the pharmacological activity of new drugs.Design and methods. The research was done using PubMed and Google Scholar databases. The review included available publications as of October 16, 2022.Results. It was discovered that single-center studies did not allow predicting the magnitude of the effect accurately, and large sample sizes made the estimation of the magnitude of the effect even less precise.Conclusions. The main purpose of multicenter non-clinical studies rather should be assessing the direction of the effect, including its “stability”, as well as to identify sources of heterogeneity between studies conducted in different laboratories (centers) than performing a quantitative assessment of the effect on several laboratories, as it tend to be in foreign non-clinical practice.
在非临床阶段引入多中心设计以克服临床试验中的转化障碍
背景。将单个临床前研究(PCTs)结果转化为临床实践伴随着大量的失败,并与大量的时间和财务成本相关。单个非临床研究的不满意设计和在一个实验室完成体内实验后提交的报告无法克服翻译障碍并提高结果的可重复性。开展多中心非临床试验,有助于确认药物的有效性,增加非临床结果成功转化为临床实践的机会。分析有关新药药理活性的多中心非临床研究的科学文献。设计和方法。这项研究是使用PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库完成的。该综述包括截至2022年10月16日的可用出版物。人们发现,单中心研究不能准确地预测影响的大小,而大样本量使对影响大小的估计更加不精确。多中心非临床研究的主要目的应该是评估效果的方向,包括其“稳定性”,以及确定在不同实验室(中心)进行的研究之间的异质性来源,而不是对几个实验室的效果进行定量评估,因为它往往是在国外的非临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书