Combining ex-ante and ex-post assessments to support the sustainable transformation of agriculture: the case of Swiss pesticide-free wheat production

Q open Pub Date : 2022-08-13 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoac022
N. Möhring, R. Huber, R. Finger
{"title":"Combining ex-ante and ex-post assessments to support the sustainable transformation of agriculture: the case of Swiss pesticide-free wheat production","authors":"N. Möhring, R. Huber, R. Finger","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoac022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sustainable intensification of agriculture requires the adoption of new production techniques, tools, and programs on a large scale. This implies substantial shifts in established ways of farming under uncertain information about potential economic and environmental outcomes. Research can support stakeholders such as farmers, industry, and policy in this transformation by providing evidence-based information. The provision of such information can be improved by combining ex-ante and ex-post assessment tools at different stages of policy cycles and projects. We here present a unique combination of ex-ante bio-economic modelling analysis and ex-post econometric analyses based on survey data using the example of a novel pesticide-free wheat production program in Switzerland. We exemplify how ex-ante and ex-post evaluation can be combined to increase robustness of results for stakeholders, e.g. on yield losses from pesticide-free production or farmer typologies important for adoption. Further, we show how their alignment can improve future assessments in project and policy cycles, e.g. through the choice of suitable variables explaining farmer decision-making and priors on the distribution of their characteristics. Despite the identified synergies between assessments, we also find that their integration is limited by timing and information requirements of stakeholders at different stages in the project. Finally, potential synergies in our case study strongly depended on the type of ex-ante models chosen for evaluation and their alignment with ex-post methods. Especially integrating farmer behaviour in ex-ante assessments seems to be crucial to arrive at holistic evaluations of large-scale programs for sustainable agricultural practices and providing useful information to stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoac022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sustainable intensification of agriculture requires the adoption of new production techniques, tools, and programs on a large scale. This implies substantial shifts in established ways of farming under uncertain information about potential economic and environmental outcomes. Research can support stakeholders such as farmers, industry, and policy in this transformation by providing evidence-based information. The provision of such information can be improved by combining ex-ante and ex-post assessment tools at different stages of policy cycles and projects. We here present a unique combination of ex-ante bio-economic modelling analysis and ex-post econometric analyses based on survey data using the example of a novel pesticide-free wheat production program in Switzerland. We exemplify how ex-ante and ex-post evaluation can be combined to increase robustness of results for stakeholders, e.g. on yield losses from pesticide-free production or farmer typologies important for adoption. Further, we show how their alignment can improve future assessments in project and policy cycles, e.g. through the choice of suitable variables explaining farmer decision-making and priors on the distribution of their characteristics. Despite the identified synergies between assessments, we also find that their integration is limited by timing and information requirements of stakeholders at different stages in the project. Finally, potential synergies in our case study strongly depended on the type of ex-ante models chosen for evaluation and their alignment with ex-post methods. Especially integrating farmer behaviour in ex-ante assessments seems to be crucial to arrive at holistic evaluations of large-scale programs for sustainable agricultural practices and providing useful information to stakeholders.
结合事前和事后评估支持农业可持续转型:以瑞士无农药小麦生产为例
农业的可持续集约化需要大规模采用新的生产技术、工具和方案。这意味着,在潜在经济和环境结果信息不确定的情况下,现有的耕作方式将发生重大转变。研究可以通过提供基于证据的信息,支持农民、工业和政策等利益相关者进行这一转变。可以通过在政策周期和项目的不同阶段结合事前和事后评估工具来改进这种资料的提供。本文以瑞士一种新型无农药小麦生产项目为例,提出了一种基于调查数据的事前生物经济建模分析和事后计量经济学分析的独特组合。我们举例说明了如何将事前和事后评估相结合,以提高利益相关者结果的稳健性,例如,关于无农药生产的产量损失或对采用很重要的农民类型。此外,我们还展示了它们的一致性如何改善项目和政策周期中的未来评估,例如,通过选择合适的变量来解释农民的决策和特征分布的先验。尽管确定了评估之间的协同作用,但我们也发现它们的整合受到项目中不同阶段利益相关者的时间和信息需求的限制。最后,在我们的案例研究中,潜在的协同效应很大程度上取决于选择用于评估的事前模型的类型及其与事后方法的一致性。特别是,将农民行为纳入事前评估似乎对于全面评估大规模可持续农业实践项目和向利益相关者提供有用信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信