Measuring Cross-National Variations in Religiosity and Attitudes Toward Science and Technology Using Machine Learning

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
John J. Lee
{"title":"Measuring Cross-National Variations in Religiosity and Attitudes Toward Science and Technology Using Machine Learning","authors":"John J. Lee","doi":"10.1080/00380253.2023.2165573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study uses resampling methods and machine learning to measure how religio-scientific groups are distributed across regions, countries/territories, and religious groups. Across 76 societies (N = 143,092), the distribution of class membership is as follows: traditional (31.9 percent), modern (23.7 percent), post-secular (30.3 percent), and postmodern (14.1 percent). Although most societies are dominated by a single class, there is evidence of significant heterogeneity within societies in class prevalence. Those with post-secular views are both religious and feel favorably toward science; however, when faced with a conflict between religion and science they tend to support religion. Ultimately, societies with large traditional and post-secular classes are significantly more likely to support religion given a conflict with science; in contrast, the reverse is true for societies with large modern and postmodern classes.","PeriodicalId":48007,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Quarterly","volume":"64 1","pages":"423 - 444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2023.2165573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study uses resampling methods and machine learning to measure how religio-scientific groups are distributed across regions, countries/territories, and religious groups. Across 76 societies (N = 143,092), the distribution of class membership is as follows: traditional (31.9 percent), modern (23.7 percent), post-secular (30.3 percent), and postmodern (14.1 percent). Although most societies are dominated by a single class, there is evidence of significant heterogeneity within societies in class prevalence. Those with post-secular views are both religious and feel favorably toward science; however, when faced with a conflict between religion and science they tend to support religion. Ultimately, societies with large traditional and post-secular classes are significantly more likely to support religion given a conflict with science; in contrast, the reverse is true for societies with large modern and postmodern classes.
使用机器学习测量宗教信仰和对科学技术态度的跨国差异
本研究使用重采样方法和机器学习来衡量宗教科学团体在地区、国家/地区和宗教团体之间的分布情况。在76个社会(N = 143092)中,阶级成员的分布如下:传统(31.9%),现代(23.7%),后世俗(30.3%),后现代(14.1%)。虽然大多数社会由单一阶级统治,但有证据表明,社会内部的阶级流行程度存在显著的异质性。持后世俗观点的人既信仰宗教,又对科学抱有好感;然而,当面对宗教与科学的冲突时,他们倾向于支持宗教。最终,在与科学发生冲突的情况下,拥有庞大的传统和后世俗阶级的社会更有可能支持宗教;相反,对于拥有大量现代和后现代阶级的社会,情况正好相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Sociological Quarterly is devoted to publishing cutting-edge research and theory in all areas of sociological inquiry. Our focus is on publishing the best in empirical research and sociological theory. We look for articles that advance the discipline and reach the widest possible audience. Since 1960, the contributors and readers of The Sociological Quarterly have made it one of the leading generalist journals in the field. Each issue is designed for efficient browsing and reading and the articles are helpful for teaching and classroom use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信