The concepts of ‘Zulu tribe’ and ‘Zulu nation’ and their use towards political aspirations in South Africa

Mthandeni Patric Mbatha, Mxolisi Bongumusa PraseGod Cebekhulu
{"title":"The concepts of ‘Zulu tribe’ and ‘Zulu nation’ and their use towards political aspirations in South Africa","authors":"Mthandeni Patric Mbatha, Mxolisi Bongumusa PraseGod Cebekhulu","doi":"10.21303/2313-8416.2022.002869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The object of research: This article presents an overview of how the concept of tribe and nation has been manipulated for political end. The first part of the paper clearly establishes that the two concepts are not only different but also represent different epochs in Zulu history. \nInvestigated problem: this article interrogates this neglected subject by focusing on how Europeans used different terms to denegrate Africans during colonialism. The main objective is to reveal social agency, showing that the African ethnic groups were also capable of making nations before the arrival of colonialism. \nThe main scientific results: The findings of this paper indicated that the concepts ‘tribe’ and ‘nation’ present different epochs in Zulu history therefore using them interchangeably as if they refer to one thing is politically incorrect. Moreover, findings indicated that there is nothing wrong with the words as they are defined by dictionaries but the way in which they were used created confusion. \nInnovative product: The result of this study will be incorporated in our history curriculum, which specifically focuses at how the process of colonization affected the Zulu monarchy. \nThe area of practical use of the research results: The study is of importance to South African historians and those who are interested to study the transition of AmaZulu from a tribe to a nation.","PeriodicalId":30651,"journal":{"name":"ScienceRise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceRise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21303/2313-8416.2022.002869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The object of research: This article presents an overview of how the concept of tribe and nation has been manipulated for political end. The first part of the paper clearly establishes that the two concepts are not only different but also represent different epochs in Zulu history. Investigated problem: this article interrogates this neglected subject by focusing on how Europeans used different terms to denegrate Africans during colonialism. The main objective is to reveal social agency, showing that the African ethnic groups were also capable of making nations before the arrival of colonialism. The main scientific results: The findings of this paper indicated that the concepts ‘tribe’ and ‘nation’ present different epochs in Zulu history therefore using them interchangeably as if they refer to one thing is politically incorrect. Moreover, findings indicated that there is nothing wrong with the words as they are defined by dictionaries but the way in which they were used created confusion. Innovative product: The result of this study will be incorporated in our history curriculum, which specifically focuses at how the process of colonization affected the Zulu monarchy. The area of practical use of the research results: The study is of importance to South African historians and those who are interested to study the transition of AmaZulu from a tribe to a nation.
“祖鲁部落”和“祖鲁民族”的概念及其在南非政治诉求中的应用
研究对象:本文概述了部落和民族的概念是如何被政治目的所操纵的。本文的第一部分明确了这两个概念不仅不同,而且代表了祖鲁历史上不同的时代。调查问题:这篇文章通过关注欧洲人在殖民主义期间如何使用不同的术语来诋毁非洲人来询问这个被忽视的主题。主要目的是揭示社会能动性,表明非洲民族在殖民主义到来之前也有能力建立国家。主要科学结果:本文的研究结果表明,“部落”和“民族”这两个概念代表了祖鲁人历史上的不同时代,因此,将它们互换使用,就好像它们指的是一件事一样,在政治上是不正确的。此外,调查结果表明,这些词在字典上的定义并没有错,只是它们的使用方式造成了混淆。创新成果:这项研究的结果将被纳入我们的历史课程,特别侧重于殖民化过程如何影响祖鲁君主制。研究成果的实际应用领域:这项研究对南非历史学家和那些有兴趣研究AmaZulu从一个部落到一个国家的转变的人具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信