Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine
J. Casarin, C. Cimmino, V. Artuso, A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi
{"title":"Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations.","authors":"J. Casarin, C. Cimmino, V. Artuso, A. Cromi, F. Ghezzi","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04753-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe word \"minilaparoscopy\" refers to laparoscopic surgical procedures performed using < 5-mm trocars, with the exception of the umbilical access. The aim of this review is to explore the feasibility of minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery, focusing on instruments, surgical techniques, application and limits of this approach.\n\n\nEVIDENCE ACQUISITION\nIn this review the Authors discuss positive features and limitation of 3-mm laparoscopy for gynecologic surgery.\n\n\nEVIDENCE SYNTHESIS\nUsing smaller trocars decreases incisional and postoperative pain, and shortens hospitalization, and provides a better cosmetic outcome. Transvaginal specimen extraction can be used to maximize the aesthetic outcomes. A minilaparoscopic surgical procedure is accomplished with lower carbon dioxide pressures, reducing pneumoperitoneum related complications. Accurate patient selection is critical in order to offer the best laparoscopic approach, considering that obesity and endometriosis may represent a challenge for 3-mm surgical tools, which are more flexible and have lower grasping ability. Minilaparoscopy has been shown as a valid alternative to conventional laparoscopy both for diagnostic purpose, major surgical procedures and oncological surgery.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMinilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery represents an option for selected patients, for both benign and malignant indications. The aesthetic outcome represents the main benefit of this approach. Surgeons have to be aware of few limitations of this technique such as severe obesity and endometriosis.","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04753-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The word "minilaparoscopy" refers to laparoscopic surgical procedures performed using < 5-mm trocars, with the exception of the umbilical access. The aim of this review is to explore the feasibility of minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery, focusing on instruments, surgical techniques, application and limits of this approach. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION In this review the Authors discuss positive features and limitation of 3-mm laparoscopy for gynecologic surgery. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Using smaller trocars decreases incisional and postoperative pain, and shortens hospitalization, and provides a better cosmetic outcome. Transvaginal specimen extraction can be used to maximize the aesthetic outcomes. A minilaparoscopic surgical procedure is accomplished with lower carbon dioxide pressures, reducing pneumoperitoneum related complications. Accurate patient selection is critical in order to offer the best laparoscopic approach, considering that obesity and endometriosis may represent a challenge for 3-mm surgical tools, which are more flexible and have lower grasping ability. Minilaparoscopy has been shown as a valid alternative to conventional laparoscopy both for diagnostic purpose, major surgical procedures and oncological surgery. CONCLUSIONS Minilaparoscopy in gynecologic surgery represents an option for selected patients, for both benign and malignant indications. The aesthetic outcome represents the main benefit of this approach. Surgeons have to be aware of few limitations of this technique such as severe obesity and endometriosis.
微型腹腔镜在妇科的应用、益处和局限性。
引言“微型腹腔镜”一词指的是使用<5mm套管针进行的腹腔镜手术,脐带入路除外。本综述旨在探讨微型腹腔镜在妇科手术中的可行性,重点介绍该方法的仪器、手术技术、应用和局限性。证据收集在这篇综述中,作者讨论了妇科手术3mm腹腔镜的积极特点和局限性。证据综合使用较小的套管针可以减少切口和术后疼痛,缩短住院时间,并提供更好的美容效果。经阴道标本提取可用于最大限度地提高美观效果。小型腹腔镜手术可以降低二氧化碳压力,减少气腹相关并发症。考虑到肥胖和子宫内膜异位症可能对3mm手术工具构成挑战,准确的患者选择对于提供最佳腹腔镜手术方法至关重要,因为3mm手术工具更灵活,抓握能力更低。微型腹腔镜检查已被证明是传统腹腔镜检查的有效替代品,无论是在诊断目的、主要手术程序还是肿瘤学手术方面。结论妇科手术中的微型腹腔镜是选定患者的一种选择,包括良性和恶性适应症。美学结果代表了这种方法的主要好处。外科医生必须意识到这种技术的一些局限性,如严重肥胖和子宫内膜异位症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信