{"title":"Representing victims and offenders in contemporary performance: the ideal and the complex in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure","authors":"Amanda Finch","doi":"10.1080/17521483.2021.1983173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article uses the criminological frameworks of ideal and complex victims to explore the Donmar Warehouse’s 2018 production of Measure for Measure that grounded the play in references to the Me Too movement. This production staged two versions of the play in one performance, including regendering and role-switching of the central antagonists, which drew attention to the gender dynamics of victimization and offence. While the traditional Isabella was shown to be a nigh perfect ideal victim, when she assumed the offender’s role and victimized Angelo, no neat reversal of power roles was possible. A framework that allows for more complex understandings of victims and offenders is necessary to read this version and to apprehend these issues in real life contexts. This article argues that representations of victims and offenders in theatrical performance have the power to affect understandings of victimization in broader socio-legal contexts and therefore deserve close analysis.","PeriodicalId":42313,"journal":{"name":"Law and Humanities","volume":"15 1","pages":"146 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2021.1983173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article uses the criminological frameworks of ideal and complex victims to explore the Donmar Warehouse’s 2018 production of Measure for Measure that grounded the play in references to the Me Too movement. This production staged two versions of the play in one performance, including regendering and role-switching of the central antagonists, which drew attention to the gender dynamics of victimization and offence. While the traditional Isabella was shown to be a nigh perfect ideal victim, when she assumed the offender’s role and victimized Angelo, no neat reversal of power roles was possible. A framework that allows for more complex understandings of victims and offenders is necessary to read this version and to apprehend these issues in real life contexts. This article argues that representations of victims and offenders in theatrical performance have the power to affect understandings of victimization in broader socio-legal contexts and therefore deserve close analysis.
期刊介绍:
Law and Humanities is a peer-reviewed journal, providing a forum for scholarly discourse within the arts and humanities around the subject of law. For this purpose, the arts and humanities disciplines are taken to include literature, history (including history of art), philosophy, theology, classics and the whole spectrum of performance and representational arts. The remit of the journal does not extend to consideration of the laws that regulate practical aspects of the arts and humanities (such as the law of intellectual property). Law and Humanities is principally concerned to engage with those aspects of human experience which are not empirically quantifiable or scientifically predictable. Each issue will carry four or five major articles of between 8,000 and 12,000 words each. The journal will also carry shorter papers (up to 4,000 words) sharing good practice in law and humanities education; reports of conferences; reviews of books, exhibitions, plays, concerts and other artistic publications.