{"title":"The European Union’s List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions for Tax Purposes","authors":"Alexandra Koutsouva","doi":"10.54648/ecta2020045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2017, the European Union published for the first time a list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes aiming at creating a dynamic tool in the battle against tax avoidance, whilst promoting worldwide tax good governance. This article aims to examine the efficiency of this blacklist through analysing the process followed for its compilation and the particular objectives that the EU wanted to achieve through this initiative. The main focus will be on categorizing the blacklisted countries and on finding the rationale behind each jurisdiction’s inclusion. However, after analysing the cases of the jurisdictions that are included in the list, questions will be raised over the efficiency and adequacy of the EU blacklist as a tool against tax evasion and avoidance. The fact that the creation of the blacklist can be characterized as a political process driven by specific interests and subject to the states’ power imbalances tarnishes its effectiveness and covers its positive externalities.\nTax havens, EU blacklist, BEPS, Tax transparency, Preferential Tax Regimes, data leaks, defensive measures, information exchange, fair taxation, golden visas","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In December 2017, the European Union published for the first time a list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes aiming at creating a dynamic tool in the battle against tax avoidance, whilst promoting worldwide tax good governance. This article aims to examine the efficiency of this blacklist through analysing the process followed for its compilation and the particular objectives that the EU wanted to achieve through this initiative. The main focus will be on categorizing the blacklisted countries and on finding the rationale behind each jurisdiction’s inclusion. However, after analysing the cases of the jurisdictions that are included in the list, questions will be raised over the efficiency and adequacy of the EU blacklist as a tool against tax evasion and avoidance. The fact that the creation of the blacklist can be characterized as a political process driven by specific interests and subject to the states’ power imbalances tarnishes its effectiveness and covers its positive externalities.
Tax havens, EU blacklist, BEPS, Tax transparency, Preferential Tax Regimes, data leaks, defensive measures, information exchange, fair taxation, golden visas