The European Union’s List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions for Tax Purposes

Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2020045
Alexandra Koutsouva
{"title":"The European Union’s List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions for Tax Purposes","authors":"Alexandra Koutsouva","doi":"10.54648/ecta2020045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In December 2017, the European Union published for the first time a list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes aiming at creating a dynamic tool in the battle against tax avoidance, whilst promoting worldwide tax good governance. This article aims to examine the efficiency of this blacklist through analysing the process followed for its compilation and the particular objectives that the EU wanted to achieve through this initiative. The main focus will be on categorizing the blacklisted countries and on finding the rationale behind each jurisdiction’s inclusion. However, after analysing the cases of the jurisdictions that are included in the list, questions will be raised over the efficiency and adequacy of the EU blacklist as a tool against tax evasion and avoidance. The fact that the creation of the blacklist can be characterized as a political process driven by specific interests and subject to the states’ power imbalances tarnishes its effectiveness and covers its positive externalities.\nTax havens, EU blacklist, BEPS, Tax transparency, Preferential Tax Regimes, data leaks, defensive measures, information exchange, fair taxation, golden visas","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In December 2017, the European Union published for the first time a list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes aiming at creating a dynamic tool in the battle against tax avoidance, whilst promoting worldwide tax good governance. This article aims to examine the efficiency of this blacklist through analysing the process followed for its compilation and the particular objectives that the EU wanted to achieve through this initiative. The main focus will be on categorizing the blacklisted countries and on finding the rationale behind each jurisdiction’s inclusion. However, after analysing the cases of the jurisdictions that are included in the list, questions will be raised over the efficiency and adequacy of the EU blacklist as a tool against tax evasion and avoidance. The fact that the creation of the blacklist can be characterized as a political process driven by specific interests and subject to the states’ power imbalances tarnishes its effectiveness and covers its positive externalities. Tax havens, EU blacklist, BEPS, Tax transparency, Preferential Tax Regimes, data leaks, defensive measures, information exchange, fair taxation, golden visas
分享
查看原文
欧盟税务目的不合作管辖区清单
2017年12月,欧盟首次公布了一份非合作税务管辖区名单,旨在为打击避税创造一个充满活力的工具,同时促进全球税收良政。本文旨在通过分析黑名单的编制过程以及欧盟希望通过这一举措实现的特定目标,来审查黑名单的效率。主要重点将是对列入黑名单的国家进行分类,并找出每个司法管辖区被列入黑名单背后的理由。然而,在分析了名单中所列司法管辖区的案例后,人们将对欧盟黑名单作为打击逃税和避税工具的效率和充分性提出质疑。黑名单的创建可以被描述为一个由特定利益驱动、受制于国家权力失衡的政治过程,这一事实玷污了黑名单的有效性,并掩盖了其积极的外部性。避税天堂、欧盟黑名单、BEPS、税务透明度、优惠税收制度、数据泄露、防御措施、信息交流、公平税收、黄金签证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信