Legal Formulation of Imposing Administrative Sanction for Anti-Covid-19 Vaccinations Movement

R. Rusdianto, Diva Pitaloka
{"title":"Legal Formulation of Imposing Administrative Sanction for Anti-Covid-19 Vaccinations Movement","authors":"R. Rusdianto, Diva Pitaloka","doi":"10.15294/ulj.v7i1.54017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to accelerate the handling Covid-19, the Government has issued a policy that impose administrative sanction for those refusing Covid-19 vaccination. This journal underlines and focuses the administrative sanction for those who refuse to take the vaccinations. Those sanctions could be social security termination, and/or administrative service moratorium. While it is assumed that this policy is urgently needed in addressing the pandemic issue, it also leads to other issues. The first is that whether those administrative sanctions are compliant with law principles and human rights protection. Another is whether there are legal implications for those who refuse to take vaccinations. Method adopted in this research is normative law research method based on facts, issues, regulations, analysis, and conclusion (FIRAK). This journal points out two results. Firstly, the right to obtain health service is a part of human rights. In order to fulfill that right and to achieve a greater good, the Government is responsible to create a clean and healthy environment. Thus, providing Covid-19 vaccinations and imposing administrative sanction comply with law principles and human rights protection. The latter, legal implication from such policy is that the vaccination is mandatory. Thus, those refusing it would be imposed administrative sanctions. It is expected that this policy would become a legal formulation in addressing and handling the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":30820,"journal":{"name":"Unnes Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unnes Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.54017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to accelerate the handling Covid-19, the Government has issued a policy that impose administrative sanction for those refusing Covid-19 vaccination. This journal underlines and focuses the administrative sanction for those who refuse to take the vaccinations. Those sanctions could be social security termination, and/or administrative service moratorium. While it is assumed that this policy is urgently needed in addressing the pandemic issue, it also leads to other issues. The first is that whether those administrative sanctions are compliant with law principles and human rights protection. Another is whether there are legal implications for those who refuse to take vaccinations. Method adopted in this research is normative law research method based on facts, issues, regulations, analysis, and conclusion (FIRAK). This journal points out two results. Firstly, the right to obtain health service is a part of human rights. In order to fulfill that right and to achieve a greater good, the Government is responsible to create a clean and healthy environment. Thus, providing Covid-19 vaccinations and imposing administrative sanction comply with law principles and human rights protection. The latter, legal implication from such policy is that the vaccination is mandatory. Thus, those refusing it would be imposed administrative sanctions. It is expected that this policy would become a legal formulation in addressing and handling the Covid-19 pandemic.
对防疫接种运动实施行政处罚的法律制定
为了加快处理新冠肺炎,政府发布了一项政策,对拒绝接种新冠肺炎疫苗的人实施行政处罚。本期刊强调并重点关注对拒绝接种疫苗者的行政处罚。这些制裁可以是终止社会保障和(或)暂停行政服务。虽然人们认为这项政策在解决疫情问题时是迫切需要的,但它也会导致其他问题。第一个问题是,这些行政制裁是否符合法律原则和人权保护。另一个问题是,拒绝接种疫苗的人是否会受到法律影响。本研究所采用的方法是基于事实、问题、规定、分析和结论的规范性法律研究方法(FIRAK)。这本期刊指出了两个结果。首先,获得医疗服务的权利是人权的一部分。为了实现这一权利并实现更大的利益,政府有责任创造一个清洁和健康的环境。因此,提供新冠肺炎疫苗接种和实施行政制裁符合法律原则和人权保护。后者,这种政策的法律含义是疫苗接种是强制性的。因此,拒绝者将受到行政制裁。预计这项政策将成为应对和处理新冠肺炎大流行的法律制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书