Socioeconomic Determinants of Life Expectancy: Southeastern European Countries

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Emiljan Karma
{"title":"Socioeconomic Determinants of Life Expectancy: Southeastern European Countries","authors":"Emiljan Karma","doi":"10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n1p25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the socioeconomic determinants of life expectancy in Southeastern Europe countries highlighting the most important factors that can affect life expectancy in this part of Europe.    \nTwo Panel Data Regression with fixed–effects model was applied for 20 years from 2000 to 2019. Eight socioeconomic and environmental explanatory variables were used to verify their influence on life expectancy. \nThe analysis highlights the important influence of factors such as urbanization; GDP per capita; fertility rate; education; marital status; CO2 emission and the non-significant influence of other factors, such as health expenditure or health care out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure. This study points out that healthcare spending (public and/or household out-of-pocket spending) is not a significant factor in improving life expectancy in SEE countries. Results illustrate that GDP per capita; urbanization, CO2 emissions, and fertility rate are the most influential and significant explanatory factors. A surprising result concerns marital status, which in this study affects life expectancy inversely in one of the panel regressions. \nLife expectancy is a very important and expressive outcome indicator for public health. Each country is committed to spending public money to improve people's quality of life, which translates into a longer life (Life expectancy), or even better, a longer and healthier life (Health Adjusted Life Expectancy). The results of this study, considering the demographic development of the SEE countries (low fertility rate and aged people), show that policymakers need to consider public healthcare organization and reassess the effectiveness of public health expenditure. On the other hand, the balanced urbanization process with a clean ecosystem (less CO2 emissions) conducts a better life quality (consequently an improved life expectancy). \nKeywords: Panel data analysis; Life Expectancy; Public Health; SEE Countries \nJel Classification: C33; H51; I15","PeriodicalId":46519,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2023.v12n1p25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper analyses the socioeconomic determinants of life expectancy in Southeastern Europe countries highlighting the most important factors that can affect life expectancy in this part of Europe.    Two Panel Data Regression with fixed–effects model was applied for 20 years from 2000 to 2019. Eight socioeconomic and environmental explanatory variables were used to verify their influence on life expectancy. The analysis highlights the important influence of factors such as urbanization; GDP per capita; fertility rate; education; marital status; CO2 emission and the non-significant influence of other factors, such as health expenditure or health care out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure. This study points out that healthcare spending (public and/or household out-of-pocket spending) is not a significant factor in improving life expectancy in SEE countries. Results illustrate that GDP per capita; urbanization, CO2 emissions, and fertility rate are the most influential and significant explanatory factors. A surprising result concerns marital status, which in this study affects life expectancy inversely in one of the panel regressions. Life expectancy is a very important and expressive outcome indicator for public health. Each country is committed to spending public money to improve people's quality of life, which translates into a longer life (Life expectancy), or even better, a longer and healthier life (Health Adjusted Life Expectancy). The results of this study, considering the demographic development of the SEE countries (low fertility rate and aged people), show that policymakers need to consider public healthcare organization and reassess the effectiveness of public health expenditure. On the other hand, the balanced urbanization process with a clean ecosystem (less CO2 emissions) conducts a better life quality (consequently an improved life expectancy). Keywords: Panel data analysis; Life Expectancy; Public Health; SEE Countries Jel Classification: C33; H51; I15
预期寿命的社会经济决定因素:东南欧国家
本文分析了东南欧国家预期寿命的社会经济决定因素,强调了影响欧洲这一地区预期寿命的最重要因素。从2000年到2019年,应用了20年的固定效应双面板数据回归模型。使用八个社会经济和环境解释变量来验证它们对预期寿命的影响。分析强调了城市化等因素的重要影响;人均国内生产总值;生育率;教育婚姻状况;二氧化碳排放和其他因素的非显著影响,如医疗支出或医疗保健自付医疗支出。这项研究指出,在SEE国家,医疗支出(公共和/或家庭自付支出)并不是提高预期寿命的重要因素。结果表明,人均国内生产总值;城市化、二氧化碳排放和生育率是最具影响力和重要的解释因素。一个令人惊讶的结果涉及婚姻状况,在这项研究中,在一个面板回归中,婚姻状况对预期寿命的影响是相反的。预期寿命是公共卫生的一个非常重要和富有表现力的结果指标。每个国家都致力于花费公共资金来提高人们的生活质量,这意味着寿命更长(预期寿命),甚至更好,寿命更长、更健康(健康调整后的预期寿命)。这项研究的结果,考虑到SEE国家的人口发展(低生育率和老年人),表明决策者需要考虑公共医疗组织,并重新评估公共卫生支出的有效性。另一方面,具有清洁生态系统(减少二氧化碳排放)的平衡城市化进程可以提高生活质量(从而提高预期寿命)。关键词:面板数据分析;预期寿命公共卫生;SEE国家Jel分类:C33;H51;I15
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
10.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信