Knowledge leakage through social networks: a review of existing gaps, strategies for mitigating potential risk factors and future research direction

IF 2.7 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
A. J. Timiyo, Samuel Foli
{"title":"Knowledge leakage through social networks: a review of existing gaps, strategies for mitigating potential risk factors and future research direction","authors":"A. J. Timiyo, Samuel Foli","doi":"10.1108/vjikms-12-2021-0313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to systematically review the literature on knowledge leakage through social networks in the past decade to find existing gaps, identify potential risk factors while, ultimately, proposing ways of mitigating these factors.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis as guide for searching relevant scholarly publications. Subject-specific and -related research papers were obtained from three databases, namely, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCOhost. The review data was generated from the search results while adopting specific criteria to either accept or reject a particular publication during the search process.\n\n\nFindings\nTechnological, operational and human knowledge factors are some of the risks resulting from knowledge leakage. Highlights of the paper include strategies for mitigating these factors, including continuous training, creating awareness, banning social media usage at work and reinforcing nondisclosure policies. This study also found potential gaps from the literature, categorized as topical, geographical, industrial, theoretical, methodological and conceptual gaps while proposing ways of addressing these gaps using specific research questions. These questions set the direction for future studies on knowledge leakage and social networks.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nImplications of the findings are laid out, particularly the idea of developing actionable managerial plans for preventing knowledge leakage from occurring in organizations in the first place. The systematic, rigorous, transparent and methodological procedures used throughout the entire research process strongly suggest that the findings and conclusions are legitimate. While the findings were not drawn arbitrarily, they potentially offer windows of opportunities for bridging the six potential gaps identified in this paper.\n","PeriodicalId":45590,"journal":{"name":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/vjikms-12-2021-0313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to systematically review the literature on knowledge leakage through social networks in the past decade to find existing gaps, identify potential risk factors while, ultimately, proposing ways of mitigating these factors. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis as guide for searching relevant scholarly publications. Subject-specific and -related research papers were obtained from three databases, namely, Scopus, Web of Science and EBSCOhost. The review data was generated from the search results while adopting specific criteria to either accept or reject a particular publication during the search process. Findings Technological, operational and human knowledge factors are some of the risks resulting from knowledge leakage. Highlights of the paper include strategies for mitigating these factors, including continuous training, creating awareness, banning social media usage at work and reinforcing nondisclosure policies. This study also found potential gaps from the literature, categorized as topical, geographical, industrial, theoretical, methodological and conceptual gaps while proposing ways of addressing these gaps using specific research questions. These questions set the direction for future studies on knowledge leakage and social networks. Originality/value Implications of the findings are laid out, particularly the idea of developing actionable managerial plans for preventing knowledge leakage from occurring in organizations in the first place. The systematic, rigorous, transparent and methodological procedures used throughout the entire research process strongly suggest that the findings and conclusions are legitimate. While the findings were not drawn arbitrarily, they potentially offer windows of opportunities for bridging the six potential gaps identified in this paper.
社交网络中的知识泄漏:现有差距、缓解潜在风险因素的策略及未来研究方向
目的本文旨在系统回顾过去十年中关于社交网络知识泄漏的文献,以发现现有的差距,识别潜在的风险因素,并最终提出缓解这些因素的方法。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用了系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目作为搜索相关学术出版物的指南。从Scopus、Web of Science和EBSCOhost三个数据库中获得了特定主题和相关的研究论文。审查数据是根据搜索结果生成的,同时在搜索过程中采用特定标准来接受或拒绝特定出版物。发现技术、操作和人类知识因素是知识泄漏造成的一些风险。该文件的重点包括缓解这些因素的策略,包括持续培训、提高意识、禁止在工作中使用社交媒体以及加强保密政策。这项研究还发现了文献中的潜在差距,分为主题、地理、工业、理论、方法和概念差距,同时提出了利用具体研究问题解决这些差距的方法。这些问题为未来关于知识泄漏和社交网络的研究指明了方向。研究结果的独创性/价值意义已经阐述,特别是制定可操作的管理计划的想法,以从一开始就防止组织中发生知识泄漏。在整个研究过程中使用的系统、严格、透明和方法论程序有力地表明,研究结果和结论是合法的。虽然这些发现并非随意得出,但它们可能为弥合本文中确定的六个潜在差距提供了机会之窗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems
VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信