Community-Based Conservation of Freshwater Resources: Learning from a Critical Review of the Literature and Case Studies

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
W. Zhang, Hagar ElDidi, Y. Masuda, R. Meinzen-Dick, K. Swallow, C. Ringler, Nicole DeMello, Allison Aldous
{"title":"Community-Based Conservation of Freshwater Resources: Learning from a Critical Review of the Literature and Case Studies","authors":"W. Zhang, Hagar ElDidi, Y. Masuda, R. Meinzen-Dick, K. Swallow, C. Ringler, Nicole DeMello, Allison Aldous","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2023.2191228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Freshwater resources (FWRs) are under enormous stress due to human activities and climate change. Given the centrality of local communities in managing natural resources, community-based conservation (CBC) for FWRs (fCBC) offers a mechanism for addressing these challenges. A framework informing fCBC that incorporates unique features of FWRs (such as being fugitive resources, having increased risk of negative externalities, and sheer spatial coverage) is needed to unlock CBC’s potential in achieving environmental and developmental impacts in freshwater contexts. We critically review and synthesize existing research adapting The Nature Conservancy’s Voice, Choice and Action framework, organized around four pillars (Secure rights and fair externality consideration; Strong community capacity; Effective multi-stakeholder platforms; Sustainable livelihood and development opportunities) and two cross-cutting elements (Cultural connections; Equity and power balancing), and provide recommendations on ways to strengthen facilitation and support community empowerment in fCBC. We report on how applying the framework during a conservation planning process for fCBC projects in four geographies provides important insights for developing robust CBC programs. HIGHLIGHTS The unique features of freshwater resources require additional considerations as compared to terrestrial resources. Elevating thinking about how these unique features can exacerbate threats helps motivate more diverse ideas on holistic strategies for community-based conservation. The Voice, Choice and Action framework has been adapted to the freshwater resource context in this study, drawing on a critical literature review. The adapted framework provides a useful framework for conducing strategy selection processes and situation and stakeholder analyses to ensure that projects pay attention to creating critical enabling conditions for robust community-based conservation for freshwater resources capable of preserving cultural connections, achieving equity and water justice, and resolving power imbalance.","PeriodicalId":48223,"journal":{"name":"Society & Natural Resources","volume":"36 1","pages":"733 - 754"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2191228","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Freshwater resources (FWRs) are under enormous stress due to human activities and climate change. Given the centrality of local communities in managing natural resources, community-based conservation (CBC) for FWRs (fCBC) offers a mechanism for addressing these challenges. A framework informing fCBC that incorporates unique features of FWRs (such as being fugitive resources, having increased risk of negative externalities, and sheer spatial coverage) is needed to unlock CBC’s potential in achieving environmental and developmental impacts in freshwater contexts. We critically review and synthesize existing research adapting The Nature Conservancy’s Voice, Choice and Action framework, organized around four pillars (Secure rights and fair externality consideration; Strong community capacity; Effective multi-stakeholder platforms; Sustainable livelihood and development opportunities) and two cross-cutting elements (Cultural connections; Equity and power balancing), and provide recommendations on ways to strengthen facilitation and support community empowerment in fCBC. We report on how applying the framework during a conservation planning process for fCBC projects in four geographies provides important insights for developing robust CBC programs. HIGHLIGHTS The unique features of freshwater resources require additional considerations as compared to terrestrial resources. Elevating thinking about how these unique features can exacerbate threats helps motivate more diverse ideas on holistic strategies for community-based conservation. The Voice, Choice and Action framework has been adapted to the freshwater resource context in this study, drawing on a critical literature review. The adapted framework provides a useful framework for conducing strategy selection processes and situation and stakeholder analyses to ensure that projects pay attention to creating critical enabling conditions for robust community-based conservation for freshwater resources capable of preserving cultural connections, achieving equity and water justice, and resolving power imbalance.
以社区为基础的淡水资源保护:从文献综述和案例研究中学习
摘要由于人类活动和气候变化,淡水资源面临着巨大的压力。鉴于当地社区在管理自然资源方面的中心地位,FWR的社区保护(CBC)为应对这些挑战提供了一种机制。需要一个结合FWR独特特征(如逃亡资源、负外部性风险增加和纯粹的空间覆盖率)的框架来告知加拿大广播公司,以释放加拿大广播公司在淡水环境中实现环境和发展影响的潜力。我们批判性地回顾和综合了采用自然保护协会的声音、选择和行动框架的现有研究,围绕四个支柱(安全的权利和公平的外部性考虑;强大的社区能力;有效的多方利益相关者平台;可持续的生计和发展机会)和两个贯穿各领域的要素(文化联系;公平和权力平衡)组织,并就如何加强便利和支持加拿大广播公司的社区赋权提供建议。我们报告了在四个地区的加拿大边境保护委员会项目的保护规划过程中应用该框架如何为制定强有力的加拿大边境管理委员会项目提供重要见解。亮点与陆地资源相比,淡水资源的独特特征需要额外考虑。提高对这些独特特征如何加剧威胁的思考,有助于激发人们对基于社区的保护整体战略的更多样化想法。在本研究中,声音、选择和行动框架已根据淡水资源背景进行了调整,并借鉴了一篇批评性文献综述。调整后的框架为进行战略选择过程以及形势和利益相关者分析提供了一个有用的框架,以确保项目注意为基于社区的淡水资源强有力的保护创造关键的有利条件,从而能够保持文化联系,实现公平和水正义,并解决权力失衡问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Society and Natural Resources publishes cutting edge social science research that advances understanding of the interaction between society and natural resources.Social science research is extensive and comes from a number of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, political science, communications, planning, education, and anthropology. We welcome research from all of these disciplines and interdisciplinary social science research that transcends the boundaries of any single social science discipline. We define natural resources broadly to include water, air, wildlife, fisheries, forests, natural lands, urban ecosystems, and intensively managed lands. While we welcome all papers that fit within this broad scope, we especially welcome papers in the following four important and broad areas in the field: 1. Protected area management and governance 2. Stakeholder analysis, consultation and engagement; deliberation processes; governance; conflict resolution; social learning; social impact assessment 3. Theoretical frameworks, epistemological issues, and methodological perspectives 4. Multiscalar character of social implications of natural resource management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信