{"title":"Strangers in the Village","authors":"Monika Gehlawat","doi":"10.7227/jbr.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay uses Edward Said’s theory of affiliation to consider the\n relationship between James Baldwin and contemporary artists Teju Cole and Glenn\n Ligon, both of whom explicitly engage with their predecessor’s writing in\n their own work. Specifically, Baldwin’s essay “Stranger in the\n Village” (1953) serves a through-line for this discussion, as it is\n invoked in Cole’s essay “Black Body” and Ligon’s\n visual series, also titled Stranger in the Village. In\n juxtaposing these three artists, I argue that they express the dialectical\n energy of affiliation by articulating ongoing concerns of race relations in\n America while distinguishing themselves from Baldwin in terms of periodization,\n medium-specificity, and their broader relationship to Western art practice. In\n their adoption of Baldwin, Cole and Ligon also imagine a way beyond his\n historical anxieties and writing-based practice, even as they continue to\n reinscribe their own work with his arguments about the African-American\n experience. This essay is an intermedial study that reads fiction, nonfiction,\n language-based conceptual art and mixed media, as well as contemporary politics\n and social media in order consider the nuances of the African-American\n experience from the postwar period to our contemporary moment. Concerns about\n visuality/visibility in the public sphere, narrative voice, and\n self-representation, as well as access to cultural artifacts and aesthetic\n engagement, all emerge in my discussion of this constellation of artists. As a\n result, this essay identifies an emblematic, though not exclusive, strand of\n African-American intellectual thinking that has never before been brought\n together. It also demonstrates the ongoing relevance of Baldwin’s\n thinking for the contemporary political scene in this country.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This essay uses Edward Said’s theory of affiliation to consider the
relationship between James Baldwin and contemporary artists Teju Cole and Glenn
Ligon, both of whom explicitly engage with their predecessor’s writing in
their own work. Specifically, Baldwin’s essay “Stranger in the
Village” (1953) serves a through-line for this discussion, as it is
invoked in Cole’s essay “Black Body” and Ligon’s
visual series, also titled Stranger in the Village. In
juxtaposing these three artists, I argue that they express the dialectical
energy of affiliation by articulating ongoing concerns of race relations in
America while distinguishing themselves from Baldwin in terms of periodization,
medium-specificity, and their broader relationship to Western art practice. In
their adoption of Baldwin, Cole and Ligon also imagine a way beyond his
historical anxieties and writing-based practice, even as they continue to
reinscribe their own work with his arguments about the African-American
experience. This essay is an intermedial study that reads fiction, nonfiction,
language-based conceptual art and mixed media, as well as contemporary politics
and social media in order consider the nuances of the African-American
experience from the postwar period to our contemporary moment. Concerns about
visuality/visibility in the public sphere, narrative voice, and
self-representation, as well as access to cultural artifacts and aesthetic
engagement, all emerge in my discussion of this constellation of artists. As a
result, this essay identifies an emblematic, though not exclusive, strand of
African-American intellectual thinking that has never before been brought
together. It also demonstrates the ongoing relevance of Baldwin’s
thinking for the contemporary political scene in this country.