The paschal theology of Abbot Ceolfrith of Wearmouth-Jarrow

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Innes Review Pub Date : 2019-11-22 DOI:10.3366/inr.2019.0225
J. Grigg
{"title":"The paschal theology of Abbot Ceolfrith of Wearmouth-Jarrow","authors":"J. Grigg","doi":"10.3366/inr.2019.0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure to achieve a consensus on a regular Easter cycle divided Christians in the second century and again in the fourth. In the seventh century and early eighth, the matter was contested among the churches of Britain and Ireland. In this period, Ceolfrith, abbot of Wearmouth-Jarrow, sent a letter to the king of the Picts, outlining the reasons for following a nineteen-year paschal cycle. Bede, in his Historia ecclesiastica, reproduced Ceolfrith's letter, preserving a unique study on the logistical and theological complexities in the debate on how to derive the correct date to celebrate Easter. Concentration on Ceolfrith's computistical argument, however, can miss his interpretation of paschal theology that emphasises the Resurrection rather than the Passion; his Christological emphasis on the biblical Exodus story; and his mystical interpretation of Easter as a spiritual journey where light triumphs over darkness. This article therefore discusses Ceolfrith's paschal theology and considers the way in which it may have affected liturgical rites.","PeriodicalId":42054,"journal":{"name":"Innes Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innes Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/inr.2019.0225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Failure to achieve a consensus on a regular Easter cycle divided Christians in the second century and again in the fourth. In the seventh century and early eighth, the matter was contested among the churches of Britain and Ireland. In this period, Ceolfrith, abbot of Wearmouth-Jarrow, sent a letter to the king of the Picts, outlining the reasons for following a nineteen-year paschal cycle. Bede, in his Historia ecclesiastica, reproduced Ceolfrith's letter, preserving a unique study on the logistical and theological complexities in the debate on how to derive the correct date to celebrate Easter. Concentration on Ceolfrith's computistical argument, however, can miss his interpretation of paschal theology that emphasises the Resurrection rather than the Passion; his Christological emphasis on the biblical Exodus story; and his mystical interpretation of Easter as a spiritual journey where light triumphs over darkness. This article therefore discusses Ceolfrith's paschal theology and considers the way in which it may have affected liturgical rites.
维尔茅斯雅罗修道院院长Ceolfrith的牧师神学
未能就正常的复活节周期达成共识,导致基督徒在二世纪和四世纪再次分裂。在七世纪和八世纪初,这件事在英国和爱尔兰的教会中引起了争议。在这一时期,威尔茅斯雅罗的住持Ceolfrith给皮克特人的国王发了一封信,概述了遵循十九年帕沙尔周期的原因。贝德在他的《教会史》中复制了塞奥尔弗里斯的信,对如何确定庆祝复活节的正确日期的辩论中的后勤和神学复杂性进行了独特的研究。然而,专注于Ceolfrith的内疚论点,可能会错过他对paschal神学的解释,该神学强调复活而非激情;他对圣经《出埃及记》故事的基督论强调;以及他对复活节的神秘解读,即光明战胜黑暗的精神之旅。因此,本文讨论了Ceolfrith的牧师神学,并思考了它可能对礼拜仪式产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innes Review
Innes Review RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信