SOME APPROACHES TO EVALUATION MACROECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF DIGITALISATION

IF 2.1 Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Business Management and Education Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI:10.3846/bme.2019.11326

E. Stremousova, O. Buchinskaia

{"title":"SOME APPROACHES TO EVALUATION MACROECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF DIGITALISATION","authors":"E. Stremousova, O. Buchinskaia","doi":"10.3846/bme.2019.11326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – the purpose of the article is to study the effect of digitalisation development indicators on per-capita GDP growth.\n\n\nResearch methodology – the basic research method is the fixed-effects panel regression that describes the effect of the digitalisation development indicators on per-capita GDP between 1999 and 2017.\n\n\nFindings – research showed the most critical factors for per-capita GDP growth are the ones that linked with fixed and mobile subscriptions.\n\n\nResearch limitations – The limitations of the research stem from the limitations of analysis as the method that has been employed makes it possible to measure the effect of the selected variables on per-capita GDP, but further research requires a detailed analysis of the factors being studied in application to each country.\n\n\nPractical implications – The findings can be used as a basis for choosing areas of more detailed factor analysis of the digitalisation process effectiveness and can support investment decision-making.\n\n\nOriginality/Value – The study enables one to identify the most and the least important factors that are reflected by digitalisation indicators that have an impact on the per-capita GDP.","PeriodicalId":42227,"journal":{"name":"Business Management and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Management and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2019.11326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose – the purpose of the article is to study the effect of digitalisation development indicators on per-capita GDP growth. Research methodology – the basic research method is the fixed-effects panel regression that describes the effect of the digitalisation development indicators on per-capita GDP between 1999 and 2017. Findings – research showed the most critical factors for per-capita GDP growth are the ones that linked with fixed and mobile subscriptions. Research limitations – The limitations of the research stem from the limitations of analysis as the method that has been employed makes it possible to measure the effect of the selected variables on per-capita GDP, but further research requires a detailed analysis of the factors being studied in application to each country. Practical implications – The findings can be used as a basis for choosing areas of more detailed factor analysis of the digitalisation process effectiveness and can support investment decision-making. Originality/Value – The study enables one to identify the most and the least important factors that are reflected by digitalisation indicators that have an impact on the per-capita GDP.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评价数字化宏观经济效率的几种方法

目的——本文的目的是研究数字化发展指标对人均GDP增长的影响。研究方法——基本研究方法是固定效应面板回归，描述了1999年至2017年间数字化发展指标对人均GDP的影响。研究结果表明，人均GDP增长的最关键因素是与固定和移动订阅相关的因素。研究局限性——研究的局限性源于分析的局限性，因为所采用的方法可以衡量所选变量对人均GDP的影响，但进一步的研究需要对每个国家所研究的因素进行详细分析。实际意义——研究结果可作为选择数字化过程有效性更详细因素分析领域的基础，并可支持投资决策。原创性/价值——该研究使人们能够确定数字化指标所反映的对人均GDP有影响的最重要和最不重要的因素。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊