Recuento y fórmula: Anclajes de la memoria en un devenir de veinticinco años

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
R. Nofal
{"title":"Recuento y fórmula: Anclajes de la memoria en un devenir de veinticinco años","authors":"R. Nofal","doi":"10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memory and testimony studies renew classic debates that confront established theses on the violence of the 20th century. In this framework, I read the critical itinerary of Anclajes as it expands the literary canon from a corpus cut out by the memoirs in conflict in the Southern Cone. I argue that memoirs are not involved as a remnant of anecdotes of a defeat, but that they emerged in the very center of literary production as a divergent corpus that illuminates a new point of conflict in the colonial dispute over language, writing and territory.","PeriodicalId":40458,"journal":{"name":"Anclajes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anclajes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memory and testimony studies renew classic debates that confront established theses on the violence of the 20th century. In this framework, I read the critical itinerary of Anclajes as it expands the literary canon from a corpus cut out by the memoirs in conflict in the Southern Cone. I argue that memoirs are not involved as a remnant of anecdotes of a defeat, but that they emerged in the very center of literary production as a divergent corpus that illuminates a new point of conflict in the colonial dispute over language, writing and territory.
计数和公式:25年未来的记忆锚定
记忆和证词研究重新引发了关于20世纪暴力的经典辩论。在这个框架下,我阅读了安克拉耶斯的批评行程,因为它从南锥体冲突回忆录中截取的语料库中扩展了文学经典。我认为,回忆录并不是失败轶事的残余,而是作为一个不同的语料库出现在文学创作的中心,照亮了殖民地语言、写作和领土争端中的一个新的冲突点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anclajes
Anclajes LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信