Estado laico e dinâmicas religiosas no Brasil: tensões e dissonâncias

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
M. Camurça, E. S. Silveira, Péricles Morais de Andrade Júnior
{"title":"Estado laico e dinâmicas religiosas no Brasil: tensões e dissonâncias","authors":"M. Camurça, E. S. Silveira, Péricles Morais de Andrade Júnior","doi":"10.5752/P.2175-5841.2020V18N57P975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This text examines the tensions and the dissonances in the relation between religion and public sphere in contemporary Brazil. Based on a Sociology and on an Anthropology of the phenomena of secularization and secularity, the purpose is to demonstrate the “porosity” of the Brazilian public/political system with the religious milieu. By applying a socio-historical perspective, the work attempts to understand how the boundaries between religion and politics were precariously constructed throughout the constitution of our State in Brazil, without ever having been institutionally well-delimited. This vacuum, which generated concessions on the part of the State to major Christian religions, guaranteed public legitimacy to their religious symbols in official state spaces, which are, in principle, neutral and secular. However, the 1988 Constitution represented the influx of modern and secular legislation that legitimized subjects of rights such as women, black people, indigenous peoples, LGBTs, environmentalists, etc. Given that background, this reflection aims at contributing to the interpretation of the complexity involved in the multiple and contradictory presence – in the public sphere – of both major Christian religions – which are based on an agenda of conservative religious values – and liberal and libertarian projects organized by segments of civil society and public agents, which generate tensions and dissonances. To understand this reality – as a mosaic of interactions and antagonisms –, we work with the notion of “pluri-confessionality” of Mexican sociologist Roberto Blancarte and also with the notions of secularity of “recognition” and of “integration” of French political scientist Philippe Portier. Hence, we attempt to reach theoretically and empirically a broader and nuanced understanding of our public-political system in the relation with the religious dimension.","PeriodicalId":43247,"journal":{"name":"Horizonte-Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciencias da Religiao","volume":"1 1","pages":"975-975"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizonte-Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciencias da Religiao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2175-5841.2020V18N57P975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This text examines the tensions and the dissonances in the relation between religion and public sphere in contemporary Brazil. Based on a Sociology and on an Anthropology of the phenomena of secularization and secularity, the purpose is to demonstrate the “porosity” of the Brazilian public/political system with the religious milieu. By applying a socio-historical perspective, the work attempts to understand how the boundaries between religion and politics were precariously constructed throughout the constitution of our State in Brazil, without ever having been institutionally well-delimited. This vacuum, which generated concessions on the part of the State to major Christian religions, guaranteed public legitimacy to their religious symbols in official state spaces, which are, in principle, neutral and secular. However, the 1988 Constitution represented the influx of modern and secular legislation that legitimized subjects of rights such as women, black people, indigenous peoples, LGBTs, environmentalists, etc. Given that background, this reflection aims at contributing to the interpretation of the complexity involved in the multiple and contradictory presence – in the public sphere – of both major Christian religions – which are based on an agenda of conservative religious values – and liberal and libertarian projects organized by segments of civil society and public agents, which generate tensions and dissonances. To understand this reality – as a mosaic of interactions and antagonisms –, we work with the notion of “pluri-confessionality” of Mexican sociologist Roberto Blancarte and also with the notions of secularity of “recognition” and of “integration” of French political scientist Philippe Portier. Hence, we attempt to reach theoretically and empirically a broader and nuanced understanding of our public-political system in the relation with the religious dimension.
巴西的世俗国家和宗教动态:紧张与不和谐
本文考察了紧张局势和不和谐的宗教和公共领域之间的关系在当代巴西。基于社会学和人类学的世俗化和世俗现象,目的是展示巴西公共/政治体系与宗教环境的“多孔性”。通过运用社会历史的观点,这项工作试图理解宗教和政治之间的界限是如何在我们巴西国家的整个宪法中不稳定地构建起来的,而从来没有在制度上得到很好的界定。这种真空使国家对主要的基督教宗教作出让步,保证了这些宗教符号在原则上是中立和世俗的官方国家空间中的公共合法性。然而,1988年《宪法》代表了现代和世俗立法的涌入,使妇女、黑人、土著人民、同性恋、双性恋和双性恋者、环保主义者等权利主体合法化。在这样的背景下,这一反思旨在有助于解释在公共领域中,基于保守宗教价值观议程的主要基督教和由民间社会和公共机构部分组织的自由主义和自由主义项目的多重和矛盾存在的复杂性,这些项目会产生紧张和不和谐。为了理解这一现实——作为相互作用和对抗的马赛克——我们与墨西哥社会学家罗伯托·布兰卡特的“多元忏悔”概念以及法国政治学家菲利普·波蒂埃的“承认”和“整合”的世俗概念一起工作。因此,我们试图从理论上和经验上对我们的公共政治系统与宗教维度的关系进行更广泛和细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信