Regulating Leisure in State Socialism

IF 0.4 Q4 COMMUNICATION
Sebastian Thalheim
{"title":"Regulating Leisure in State Socialism","authors":"Sebastian Thalheim","doi":"10.1080/13688804.2021.2013180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will argue that the popularization of the amateur genre ‘family film’ in guides, manuals and a leisure film festival became a paternalistic strategy to regulate individual moviemakers in state socialism. It reveals the benefits of historical research on guiding literature and guidelines at an amateur festival in East Germany. Analyzing promoted norms diachronically points to a changing understanding of leisure in socialism. Additionally, it reveals a complex media history that is not reduced to top-down orders. On the contrary, guides display constant negotiations between state regulation and individualism. Thus, this paper questions a perspective on private media production in the GDR that is often politicized by categories such as propaganda or subversion.","PeriodicalId":44733,"journal":{"name":"Media History","volume":"28 1","pages":"576 - 591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2021.2013180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will argue that the popularization of the amateur genre ‘family film’ in guides, manuals and a leisure film festival became a paternalistic strategy to regulate individual moviemakers in state socialism. It reveals the benefits of historical research on guiding literature and guidelines at an amateur festival in East Germany. Analyzing promoted norms diachronically points to a changing understanding of leisure in socialism. Additionally, it reveals a complex media history that is not reduced to top-down orders. On the contrary, guides display constant negotiations between state regulation and individualism. Thus, this paper questions a perspective on private media production in the GDR that is often politicized by categories such as propaganda or subversion.
论国家社会主义对休闲的规范
本文认为,在指南、手册和休闲电影节中推广业余类型的“家庭电影”,成为了在国家社会主义中规范个人电影制作人的家长式策略。它揭示了历史研究在东德业余艺术节上指导文学和指南的好处。历时性地分析被提倡的规范,指出了对社会主义休闲的理解正在发生变化。此外,它揭示了一个复杂的媒体历史,而不是自上而下的顺序。相反,指南显示了国家监管和个人主义之间不断的谈判。因此,本文对民主德国私人媒体制作的观点提出了质疑,这种观点往往被宣传或颠覆等类别政治化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Media History
Media History COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信