To be or not to be? A tale of immigrants’ entrepreneurial journey: the case of Sinorama’s international tourism empire

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting
Zheni Wang, K. Badr
{"title":"To be or not to be? A tale of immigrants’ entrepreneurial journey: the case of Sinorama’s international tourism empire","authors":"Zheni Wang, K. Badr","doi":"10.1108/tcj-11-2019-0112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nTheoretical basis\nTransnational entrepreneurs (TEs) are individuals that migrate from one country to another, concurrently maintaining business-related linkages with their former country of origin and currently adopted countries and communities. TEs are active social actors who enact networks, ideas, information and practices for the purpose of seeking business opportunities or maintaining businesses within dual-social fields, which, in turn, force them to engage in varied strategies of action to promote their entrepreneurial activities (Drori, Honig & Wright, 2009). This case research focused on the ethic, legal and cultural challenges TE has been facing when operating their business across boards.\n\n\nResearch methodology\nThe data used in this case were collected from mainly third-parties, including the office de la protection du consommateur; Office of consumer protection (OPC), securities and exchange commission (SEC) reports, news as well as marketing materials posted on public media by Sinorama Corp. and Vacances Sinorama. The authors conducted interviews with former employees of Vacances Sinorama to gain the understanding of the owners and the business challenges faced during the years of operation. The authors also communicated with the OPC through to obtain specific case-related information through the Canadian freedom of information channels. Triangulation of such information from multiple resources had been conducted to validate and support the details described in the case content.\n\n\nCase overview/synopsis\nA Chinese immigrant couple migrated to Canada and started Vacances Sinorama Inc. (“Vacances Sinorama”) in 2005. The focus of this case is on the expansion of their travel businesses after 2015. In 2016, they established a financing shell company, Sinorama Corporation (“Sinorama Corp.”), in Florida, USA, which became the holding company to the operation subsidiaries. Born during the 1970s and raised in Mainland China, the owners were culturally traditional and operated the company with the values and norms from their heritage culture. Vacances Sinorama successfully penetrated the local tourism market using Web-based technology and aggressive low-pricing strategies after the scaling-up strategies. However, Vacances Sinorama was operating in the red for several consecutive years (2015–2018). Sinorama Corp. received additional capital of US$4.4m by listing a portion of its shares on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market during 2016 and 2017. Canadian regulators began to investigate its operational and financing activities in 2017. They found a comingling of client and operation funds, which directly violated Canadian consumer protection laws. As a result of these violations, the license for Vacances Sinorama was nonrenewed in August 2018. The majority of owners fought to overturn the regulators’ decision and failed at all levels of appeal, administrative and judicial. This entrepreneurial endeavor ended with Vacances Sinorama declaring bankruptcy in October of 2018.\n\n\nComplexity academic level\nThis multipurpose teaching case aims to assist students from an integrated approach whom are learning about entrepreneurship, international business, business law and business ethics. It is best suited for advanced undergraduate courses in entrepreneurship, business ethics, international business and business law as well as specific teaching modules in MBA courses.\n","PeriodicalId":52298,"journal":{"name":"CASE Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CASE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tcj-11-2019-0112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theoretical basis Transnational entrepreneurs (TEs) are individuals that migrate from one country to another, concurrently maintaining business-related linkages with their former country of origin and currently adopted countries and communities. TEs are active social actors who enact networks, ideas, information and practices for the purpose of seeking business opportunities or maintaining businesses within dual-social fields, which, in turn, force them to engage in varied strategies of action to promote their entrepreneurial activities (Drori, Honig & Wright, 2009). This case research focused on the ethic, legal and cultural challenges TE has been facing when operating their business across boards. Research methodology The data used in this case were collected from mainly third-parties, including the office de la protection du consommateur; Office of consumer protection (OPC), securities and exchange commission (SEC) reports, news as well as marketing materials posted on public media by Sinorama Corp. and Vacances Sinorama. The authors conducted interviews with former employees of Vacances Sinorama to gain the understanding of the owners and the business challenges faced during the years of operation. The authors also communicated with the OPC through to obtain specific case-related information through the Canadian freedom of information channels. Triangulation of such information from multiple resources had been conducted to validate and support the details described in the case content. Case overview/synopsis A Chinese immigrant couple migrated to Canada and started Vacances Sinorama Inc. (“Vacances Sinorama”) in 2005. The focus of this case is on the expansion of their travel businesses after 2015. In 2016, they established a financing shell company, Sinorama Corporation (“Sinorama Corp.”), in Florida, USA, which became the holding company to the operation subsidiaries. Born during the 1970s and raised in Mainland China, the owners were culturally traditional and operated the company with the values and norms from their heritage culture. Vacances Sinorama successfully penetrated the local tourism market using Web-based technology and aggressive low-pricing strategies after the scaling-up strategies. However, Vacances Sinorama was operating in the red for several consecutive years (2015–2018). Sinorama Corp. received additional capital of US$4.4m by listing a portion of its shares on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market during 2016 and 2017. Canadian regulators began to investigate its operational and financing activities in 2017. They found a comingling of client and operation funds, which directly violated Canadian consumer protection laws. As a result of these violations, the license for Vacances Sinorama was nonrenewed in August 2018. The majority of owners fought to overturn the regulators’ decision and failed at all levels of appeal, administrative and judicial. This entrepreneurial endeavor ended with Vacances Sinorama declaring bankruptcy in October of 2018. Complexity academic level This multipurpose teaching case aims to assist students from an integrated approach whom are learning about entrepreneurship, international business, business law and business ethics. It is best suited for advanced undergraduate courses in entrepreneurship, business ethics, international business and business law as well as specific teaching modules in MBA courses.
生存还是不生存?移民的创业历程——以光华国际旅游帝国为例
理论基础跨国企业家是指从一个国家迁移到另一个国家的个人,同时与他们以前的原籍国以及目前采用的国家和社区保持着与商业相关的联系。TE是积极的社会行动者,他们制定网络、想法、信息和实践,以寻求商业机会或在双重社会领域内维持业务,这反过来又迫使他们采取各种行动策略来促进他们的创业活动(Drori,Honig&Wright,2009)。本案例研究的重点是TE在全面经营业务时所面临的道德、法律和文化挑战。研究方法本案中使用的数据主要来自第三方,包括合作伙伴保护办公室;消费者权益保护办公室(OPC)、证券交易委员会(SEC)的报告、光华公司和Vacances光华在公共媒体上发布的新闻和营销材料。作者采访了《光华》的前员工,以了解所有者以及在运营多年中面临的商业挑战。作者还通过与OPC进行了沟通,以通过加拿大信息自由渠道获得具体的案件相关信息。对来自多种资源的此类信息进行了三角分析,以验证和支持案件内容中所述的细节。案例概述/简介一对中国移民夫妇移居加拿大,于2005年创办了《华览》股份有限公司(“华览”)。这起案件的焦点是2015年后他们旅游业务的扩张。2016年,他们在美国佛罗里达州成立了一家融资空壳公司——光华公司(“光华公司”),成为运营子公司的控股公司。业主出生于20世纪70年代,在中国大陆长大,具有传统文化,并以其传统文化中的价值观和规范经营公司。光华在推广策略后,利用网络技术和积极的低价策略,成功打入当地旅游市场。然而,《空缺光华》连续几年(2015-2018)出现亏损。2016年和2017年,光华公司通过在纳斯达克场外市场上市获得了440万美元的额外资本。加拿大监管机构于2017年开始调查其运营和融资活动。他们发现了客户和运营资金的混合,这直接违反了加拿大消费者保护法。由于这些违规行为,《光华》的许可证于2018年8月被取消。大多数业主努力推翻监管机构的决定,但在各级上诉、行政和司法方面都失败了。这项创业努力于2018年10月以光华宣布破产而告终。复杂的学术水平这一多用途的教学案例旨在帮助学生从综合的角度学习创业、国际商业、商业法和商业道德。它最适合创业、商业伦理、国际商业和商业法的高级本科生课程,以及MBA课程的特定教学模块。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CASE Journal
CASE Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信