Decolonizing the Cold War

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
E. Hyde
{"title":"Decolonizing the Cold War","authors":"E. Hyde","doi":"10.3368/cl.62.2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he controlling metaphors in Monica Popescu’s At Penpoint: African Literatures, Postcolonial Studies, and the Cold War come right out of the Cold War imaginary. Popescu aims to reveal the “watermark” left by the Iron Curtain on the field of African literatures (2, 11, 26) and compares taking a Cold War view of postcolonial literary studies to applying heat or a chemical treatment to invisible ink (27, 94). These images evoke tradecraft: secret codes and hidden messages, evidence of authenticity against a background of suspicion and uncertainty. But they are also liquid metaphors and, in this sense, they aptly illuminate Popescu’s approach to her subject. In At Penpoint, the rigid binary oppositions of the Cold War period become fluid, flow in unexpected directions, and even dissolve as Popescu pursues them into the archives and texts of African literatures and literary criticism from the 1950s to the 2000s. Popescu’s biggest contribution here is historiographical: not only does she historicize African literary production during the Cold War, she also reveals the lasting effects of the Cold War on today’s intellectual concepts and commitments. The book’s structure mirrors this twostep approach to Cold War literary historiography. The first section examines African literary debates in the context of the overt cultural diplomacy and covert sponsorship programs set E M I L Y H Y D E","PeriodicalId":44998,"journal":{"name":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","volume":"62 1","pages":"262 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CONTEMPORARY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.62.2.262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

he controlling metaphors in Monica Popescu’s At Penpoint: African Literatures, Postcolonial Studies, and the Cold War come right out of the Cold War imaginary. Popescu aims to reveal the “watermark” left by the Iron Curtain on the field of African literatures (2, 11, 26) and compares taking a Cold War view of postcolonial literary studies to applying heat or a chemical treatment to invisible ink (27, 94). These images evoke tradecraft: secret codes and hidden messages, evidence of authenticity against a background of suspicion and uncertainty. But they are also liquid metaphors and, in this sense, they aptly illuminate Popescu’s approach to her subject. In At Penpoint, the rigid binary oppositions of the Cold War period become fluid, flow in unexpected directions, and even dissolve as Popescu pursues them into the archives and texts of African literatures and literary criticism from the 1950s to the 2000s. Popescu’s biggest contribution here is historiographical: not only does she historicize African literary production during the Cold War, she also reveals the lasting effects of the Cold War on today’s intellectual concepts and commitments. The book’s structure mirrors this twostep approach to Cold War literary historiography. The first section examines African literary debates in the context of the overt cultural diplomacy and covert sponsorship programs set E M I L Y H Y D E
冷战的非殖民化
莫尼卡·波佩斯库的《在pentpoint:非洲文学、后殖民研究和冷战》中的控制隐喻正是来自于冷战的想象。Popescu旨在揭示铁幕在非洲文学领域留下的“水印”(2,11,26),并将后殖民文学研究的冷战观点与加热或化学处理隐形墨水进行比较(27,94)。这些图像唤起了谍报术:暗号和隐藏的信息,在怀疑和不确定的背景下证明真实性。但它们也是流动的隐喻,在这个意义上,它们恰当地阐明了波佩斯库对她的主题的处理方法。在《在奔点》中,冷战时期僵化的二元对立变得流动,流向意想不到的方向,甚至随着波佩斯库在20世纪50年代至21世纪初非洲文学和文学批评的档案和文本中追寻它们而消解。波佩斯库在这方面最大的贡献是史学:她不仅将冷战期间的非洲文学作品历史化,还揭示了冷战对当今知识分子概念和承诺的持久影响。这本书的结构反映了冷战文学史的两步方法。第一部分考察了在公开的文化外交和秘密赞助计划的背景下的非洲文学辩论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Literature publishes scholarly essays on contemporary writing in English, interviews with established and emerging authors, and reviews of recent critical books in the field. The journal welcomes articles on multiple genres, including poetry, the novel, drama, creative nonfiction, new media and digital literature, and graphic narrative. CL published the first articles on Thomas Pynchon and Susan Howe and the first interviews with Margaret Drabble and Don DeLillo; we also helped to introduce Kazuo Ishiguro, Eavan Boland, and J.M. Coetzee to American readers. As a forum for discussing issues animating the range of contemporary literary studies, CL features the full diversity of critical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信