Samantha K. Stanley , Zoe Leviston , Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong
{"title":"Support for climate-driven migration in Australia: Testing an ideology-based threat model","authors":"Samantha K. Stanley , Zoe Leviston , Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 <em>N</em> = 467, Study 2 <em>N</em> = 1679, Study 3 <em>N</em> = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 N = 467, Study 2 N = 1679, Study 3 N = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.
我们研究了澳大利亚人对重新安置因气候变化而流离失所的人的偏好,这些人来自海外(“气候难民”),来自澳大利亚境内(“内部气候难民”),以及因战争而流离失所的人。通过三项研究(研究1 N = 467,研究2 N = 1679,研究3 N = 492),我们的研究结果显示,对重新安置已经居住在该国的难民群体(国内气候难民和战争难民)的支持更大。尽管对这三个群体的支持率都相当高,但参与者对重新安置国际气候难民的支持程度一直明显较低。这两组国际难民(由于战争或气候变化而迁移)被认为比国内流离失所的澳大利亚人构成更大的威胁。对右翼意识形态态度的支持预示着对气候难民的支持率较低,这是由象征性和现实的威胁感知所介导的。这些发现强调了意识形态、经济和文化方面的担忧可能会削弱对因气候变化而流离失所者的重新安置的支持。