On the High-Standard Trade Rules in the 21st Century and China’s Responsive Strategy—A Classical Liberalism Perspective

Chuanfang Zhang
{"title":"On the High-Standard Trade Rules in the 21st Century and China’s Responsive Strategy—A Classical Liberalism Perspective","authors":"Chuanfang Zhang","doi":"10.1163/23525207-12340030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the nineteenth century, classical liberalism originated from Britain. Nearly all the countries across the globe had benefited from the liberal international economic order ( LIEO ) under the Pax Britannia. However, the United States has never taken in classical liberalism. Rather, it regards international trade as a “zero sum game” and upholds “fair trade” through the international institution of WTO / GATT . From the British free trade to the U.S. fair trade, from the WTO to the fragmented PTA s, and from free trade to protectionism, classical liberalism has been gradually fading away. The higher standards on the various non-tariff issues in the TPP have reached a new altitude against classical liberalism. In face of the high-standard trade rules in the 21st century, China should not follow them recklessly but give due consideration to the status quo of its economic development when negotiating FTA s in the future.","PeriodicalId":31142,"journal":{"name":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","volume":"4 1","pages":"22-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23525207-12340030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chinese Journal of Global Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23525207-12340030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, classical liberalism originated from Britain. Nearly all the countries across the globe had benefited from the liberal international economic order ( LIEO ) under the Pax Britannia. However, the United States has never taken in classical liberalism. Rather, it regards international trade as a “zero sum game” and upholds “fair trade” through the international institution of WTO / GATT . From the British free trade to the U.S. fair trade, from the WTO to the fragmented PTA s, and from free trade to protectionism, classical liberalism has been gradually fading away. The higher standards on the various non-tariff issues in the TPP have reached a new altitude against classical liberalism. In face of the high-standard trade rules in the 21st century, China should not follow them recklessly but give due consideration to the status quo of its economic development when negotiating FTA s in the future.
论21世纪的高标准贸易规则与中国的应对策略——古典自由主义视角
19世纪,古典自由主义起源于英国。全球几乎所有国家都受益于英国和平时期的自由国际经济秩序。然而,美国从未接受过古典自由主义。相反,它将国际贸易视为“零和游戏”,并通过WTO/GATT的国际机构维护“公平贸易”。从英国的自由贸易到美国的公平贸易,从世贸组织到支离破碎的PTA,从自由贸易到保护主义,古典自由主义已经逐渐消失。TPP中对各种非关税问题的更高标准已经达到了反对古典自由主义的新高度。面对21世纪的高标准贸易规则,中国在未来的自由贸易协定谈判中不应盲目遵循,而应充分考虑其经济发展现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信