Not Enough Primary Categories in Peikoff’s DIM? Salutary Eclecticism and an ACID Test

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2018-08-08 DOI:10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.18.1.0098

Roger E. Bissell

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The author reprises his review of The DIM Hypothesis by arguing for an expansion and revision of Leonard Peikoff’s model to include not three, but four primary positions regarding integration (aka “DIM modes”): Integration, Disintegration, Abstract Misintegration, and Concrete Misintegration—and to include not just two mixtures of those primary positions, but twelve. He offers it as a work in progress and a remedy to the over-restrictiveness and resulting misrepresentations of various philosophers by Peikoff’s version of the model.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Peikoff的DIM中没有足够的主要类别?有益的折衷主义和ACID测试

摘要:作者通过对Leonard Peikoff的模型进行扩展和修订，重新回顾了他对DIM假说的回顾，以包括关于整合的不是三种，而是四种主要立场(又名“DIM模式”):整合、解体、抽象错整合和具体错整合，并包括这些主要立场的不仅仅是两种混合，而是12种。他认为这是一项正在进行的工作，是对佩科夫模型版本对各种哲学家的过度限制和由此产生的误解的一种补救。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.