Shedding light on taxonomic chaos: Diversity and distribution of South Asian skipper frogs (Anura, Dicroglossidae, Euphlyctis)

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
C. Dufresnes, Stephen Mahony, V. Prasad, Rachunliu G. Kamei, Rafaqat Masroor, M. Khan, A. Al-johany, Kumudani Bala Gautam, S. Gupta, L. Borkin, D. Melnikov, J. Rosanov, D. Skorinov, Amaël Borzée, D. Jablonski, S. Litvinchuk
{"title":"Shedding light on taxonomic chaos: Diversity and distribution of South Asian skipper frogs (Anura, Dicroglossidae, Euphlyctis)","authors":"C. Dufresnes, Stephen Mahony, V. Prasad, Rachunliu G. Kamei, Rafaqat Masroor, M. Khan, A. Al-johany, Kumudani Bala Gautam, S. Gupta, L. Borkin, D. Melnikov, J. Rosanov, D. Skorinov, Amaël Borzée, D. Jablonski, S. Litvinchuk","doi":"10.1080/14772000.2022.2102686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A known haven of amphibian diversity, South Asia is also a hotspot of taxonomic confusions. Vastly distributed from Saudi Arabia to Myanmar, the dicroglossid genus Euphlyctis (“skittering” or “skipper” frogs) is a representative example. Combining phylogenetic analyses with 16S barcoding and genome size variation of 403 frogs from 136 localities, we examined genetic diversity and distributions across the whole range of Euphlyctis, with a particular focus on taxonomic and nomenclatural issues. We recovered two deeply divergent mitochondrial clades totalling ten lineages that we considered as species, and eight could be attributed valid taxonomic names and junior synonyms. The first clade (subgenus Phrynoderma) is confirmed in South India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and comprises six species: E. karaavali, E. hexadactyla, E. aloysii, E. kerala and two undescribed taxa. Five are endemic to the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and four of them form the E. aloysii species complex. The second clade (subgenus Euphlyctis) extends across South Asia and neighbouring regions, and comprises four species: E. ehrenbergii, E. jaladhara, and two widespread lineages erroneously called “E. mudigere” and “E. kalasgramensis” in recent literature, while their oldest valid names appear to be E. cyanophlyctis and E. adolfi, respectively. Additional analyses on this pair of taxa highlighted strong phenotypic resemblance, notable intraspecific phylogeographic structure, and an extensive contact zone along the southern slopes of the Himalaya, with putative signs of genetic introgression. Through an independent investigation of the historical literature, we identified overlooked issues and misconceptions regarding the status of many old and recent taxa, and proposed solutions, such as transferring “E. ghoshi” to the genus Limnonectes. Our study illustrates how range-wide genetic barcoding can clarify taxonomic confusions, and we call to solve remaining issues prior to the description of new taxa.","PeriodicalId":54437,"journal":{"name":"Systematics and Biodiversity","volume":" ","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematics and Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2102686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A known haven of amphibian diversity, South Asia is also a hotspot of taxonomic confusions. Vastly distributed from Saudi Arabia to Myanmar, the dicroglossid genus Euphlyctis (“skittering” or “skipper” frogs) is a representative example. Combining phylogenetic analyses with 16S barcoding and genome size variation of 403 frogs from 136 localities, we examined genetic diversity and distributions across the whole range of Euphlyctis, with a particular focus on taxonomic and nomenclatural issues. We recovered two deeply divergent mitochondrial clades totalling ten lineages that we considered as species, and eight could be attributed valid taxonomic names and junior synonyms. The first clade (subgenus Phrynoderma) is confirmed in South India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and comprises six species: E. karaavali, E. hexadactyla, E. aloysii, E. kerala and two undescribed taxa. Five are endemic to the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and four of them form the E. aloysii species complex. The second clade (subgenus Euphlyctis) extends across South Asia and neighbouring regions, and comprises four species: E. ehrenbergii, E. jaladhara, and two widespread lineages erroneously called “E. mudigere” and “E. kalasgramensis” in recent literature, while their oldest valid names appear to be E. cyanophlyctis and E. adolfi, respectively. Additional analyses on this pair of taxa highlighted strong phenotypic resemblance, notable intraspecific phylogeographic structure, and an extensive contact zone along the southern slopes of the Himalaya, with putative signs of genetic introgression. Through an independent investigation of the historical literature, we identified overlooked issues and misconceptions regarding the status of many old and recent taxa, and proposed solutions, such as transferring “E. ghoshi” to the genus Limnonectes. Our study illustrates how range-wide genetic barcoding can clarify taxonomic confusions, and we call to solve remaining issues prior to the description of new taxa.
分类混乱:南亚跳蛙的多样性和分布(无尾目,跳蛙科,跳蛙科)
南亚是两栖动物多样性的天堂,也是分类学混乱的热点。从沙特阿拉伯到缅甸广泛分布的双蛙属Euphlyctis(“skittering”或“captain”蛙类)就是一个代表性的例子。将系统发育分析与来自136个地区的403只青蛙的16S条形码和基因组大小变异相结合,我们研究了整个幼蛙属的遗传多样性和分布,特别关注分类学和命名问题。我们发现了两个分歧很大的线粒体分支,共有十个谱系,我们认为它们是物种,其中八个可以归属于有效的分类学名称和初级同义词。第一个分支(Phryondma亚属)在南印度、孟加拉国和斯里兰卡得到确认,包括六个物种:卡拉瓦利E.karaavali、六指E.hexadactyla、阿洛伊西E.aloysii、kerala E.kerala和两个未描述的分类群。其中五种是西高止山脉生物多样性热点的特有种,其中四种形成了阿洛伊西E。第二个分支(Euphlyctis亚属)横跨南亚和邻近地区,包括四个物种:E.ehrenbergii、E.jaladhara和两个广泛分布的谱系,在最近的文献中被错误地称为“E.mudigere”和“E.kalasgramensis”,而它们最古老的有效名称似乎分别是E.cyanophlycts和E.adolfi。对这对分类群的进一步分析突出了强烈的表型相似性、显著的种内系统地理结构,以及喜马拉雅山脉南坡的广泛接触带,具有公认的遗传渗入迹象。通过对历史文献的独立调查,我们发现了许多古老和现代分类群的地位被忽视的问题和误解,并提出了解决方案,例如将“E.ghoshi”转移到Limnonectes属。我们的研究说明了广泛的遗传条形码如何澄清分类学上的混淆,我们呼吁在描述新的分类群之前解决剩余的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematics and Biodiversity
Systematics and Biodiversity 环境科学-生物多样性保护
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematics and Biodiversity is devoted to whole-organism biology. It is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed, life science journal, without page charges, which is published by Taylor & Francis for The Natural History Museum, London. The criterion for publication is scientific merit. Systematics and Biodiversity documents the diversity of organisms in all natural phyla, through taxonomic papers that have a broad context (not single species descriptions), while also addressing topical issues relating to biological collections, and the principles of systematics. It particularly emphasises the importance and multi-disciplinary significance of systematics, with contributions which address the implications of other fields for systematics, or which advance our understanding of other fields through taxonomic knowledge, especially in relation to the nature, origins, and conservation of biodiversity, at all taxonomic levels. The journal does not publish single species descriptions, monographs or applied research nor alpha species descriptions. Taxonomic manuscripts must include modern methods such as cladistics or phylogenetic analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信