C. Dufresnes, Stephen Mahony, V. Prasad, Rachunliu G. Kamei, Rafaqat Masroor, M. Khan, A. Al-johany, Kumudani Bala Gautam, S. Gupta, L. Borkin, D. Melnikov, J. Rosanov, D. Skorinov, Amaël Borzée, D. Jablonski, S. Litvinchuk
{"title":"Shedding light on taxonomic chaos: Diversity and distribution of South Asian skipper frogs (Anura, Dicroglossidae, Euphlyctis)","authors":"C. Dufresnes, Stephen Mahony, V. Prasad, Rachunliu G. Kamei, Rafaqat Masroor, M. Khan, A. Al-johany, Kumudani Bala Gautam, S. Gupta, L. Borkin, D. Melnikov, J. Rosanov, D. Skorinov, Amaël Borzée, D. Jablonski, S. Litvinchuk","doi":"10.1080/14772000.2022.2102686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A known haven of amphibian diversity, South Asia is also a hotspot of taxonomic confusions. Vastly distributed from Saudi Arabia to Myanmar, the dicroglossid genus Euphlyctis (“skittering” or “skipper” frogs) is a representative example. Combining phylogenetic analyses with 16S barcoding and genome size variation of 403 frogs from 136 localities, we examined genetic diversity and distributions across the whole range of Euphlyctis, with a particular focus on taxonomic and nomenclatural issues. We recovered two deeply divergent mitochondrial clades totalling ten lineages that we considered as species, and eight could be attributed valid taxonomic names and junior synonyms. The first clade (subgenus Phrynoderma) is confirmed in South India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and comprises six species: E. karaavali, E. hexadactyla, E. aloysii, E. kerala and two undescribed taxa. Five are endemic to the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and four of them form the E. aloysii species complex. The second clade (subgenus Euphlyctis) extends across South Asia and neighbouring regions, and comprises four species: E. ehrenbergii, E. jaladhara, and two widespread lineages erroneously called “E. mudigere” and “E. kalasgramensis” in recent literature, while their oldest valid names appear to be E. cyanophlyctis and E. adolfi, respectively. Additional analyses on this pair of taxa highlighted strong phenotypic resemblance, notable intraspecific phylogeographic structure, and an extensive contact zone along the southern slopes of the Himalaya, with putative signs of genetic introgression. Through an independent investigation of the historical literature, we identified overlooked issues and misconceptions regarding the status of many old and recent taxa, and proposed solutions, such as transferring “E. ghoshi” to the genus Limnonectes. Our study illustrates how range-wide genetic barcoding can clarify taxonomic confusions, and we call to solve remaining issues prior to the description of new taxa.","PeriodicalId":54437,"journal":{"name":"Systematics and Biodiversity","volume":" ","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematics and Biodiversity","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2102686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
A known haven of amphibian diversity, South Asia is also a hotspot of taxonomic confusions. Vastly distributed from Saudi Arabia to Myanmar, the dicroglossid genus Euphlyctis (“skittering” or “skipper” frogs) is a representative example. Combining phylogenetic analyses with 16S barcoding and genome size variation of 403 frogs from 136 localities, we examined genetic diversity and distributions across the whole range of Euphlyctis, with a particular focus on taxonomic and nomenclatural issues. We recovered two deeply divergent mitochondrial clades totalling ten lineages that we considered as species, and eight could be attributed valid taxonomic names and junior synonyms. The first clade (subgenus Phrynoderma) is confirmed in South India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and comprises six species: E. karaavali, E. hexadactyla, E. aloysii, E. kerala and two undescribed taxa. Five are endemic to the Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot and four of them form the E. aloysii species complex. The second clade (subgenus Euphlyctis) extends across South Asia and neighbouring regions, and comprises four species: E. ehrenbergii, E. jaladhara, and two widespread lineages erroneously called “E. mudigere” and “E. kalasgramensis” in recent literature, while their oldest valid names appear to be E. cyanophlyctis and E. adolfi, respectively. Additional analyses on this pair of taxa highlighted strong phenotypic resemblance, notable intraspecific phylogeographic structure, and an extensive contact zone along the southern slopes of the Himalaya, with putative signs of genetic introgression. Through an independent investigation of the historical literature, we identified overlooked issues and misconceptions regarding the status of many old and recent taxa, and proposed solutions, such as transferring “E. ghoshi” to the genus Limnonectes. Our study illustrates how range-wide genetic barcoding can clarify taxonomic confusions, and we call to solve remaining issues prior to the description of new taxa.
期刊介绍:
Systematics and Biodiversity is devoted to whole-organism biology. It is a quarterly, international, peer-reviewed, life science journal, without page charges, which is published by Taylor & Francis for The Natural History Museum, London. The criterion for publication is scientific merit. Systematics and Biodiversity documents the diversity of organisms in all natural phyla, through taxonomic papers that have a broad context (not single species descriptions), while also addressing topical issues relating to biological collections, and the principles of systematics. It particularly emphasises the importance and multi-disciplinary significance of systematics, with contributions which address the implications of other fields for systematics, or which advance our understanding of other fields through taxonomic knowledge, especially in relation to the nature, origins, and conservation of biodiversity, at all taxonomic levels.
The journal does not publish single species descriptions, monographs or applied research nor alpha species descriptions. Taxonomic manuscripts must include modern methods such as cladistics or phylogenetic analysis.