Why Relationships Fail: Donor Insights on Defining and Understanding Successes and Failures in Nonprofit Stewardship

IF 4.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
V. Harrison
{"title":"Why Relationships Fail: Donor Insights on Defining and Understanding Successes and Failures in Nonprofit Stewardship","authors":"V. Harrison","doi":"10.1080/1062726X.2023.2198237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stewardship in public relations is how nonprofits deepen relationships with donors over time. However, reality has demonstrated many instances where organization-donor relationships still fail despite communication. This study takes a unique look at the practice of stewardship in public relations by examining why some donor-nonprofit relationships are unsuccessful. Drawing upon theories of contingency and dialogue as well as concepts related to donor dropout, this paper seeks to apply recent developments in public relations literature to stewardship and donor OPRs. The paper takes a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews with 26 donors from nonprofits across the United States to examine their experiences with nonprofits. Inductive analysis found seven key themes relating to stewardship practices that could make or break a donor relationship: Irresponsible Reporting, Meaningless Engagement, Unsanctioned Recognition, Legal and Policy Constraints, Financial Instability, Poor Fit with Mission and Personal Interests, and Social Mismatch. Together, these elements show that donors leave when they do not find opportunities to engage in true dialogue, that good relationships can fail over time, and donor disloyalty is worth further investigation.","PeriodicalId":47737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Relations Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Relations Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2198237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Stewardship in public relations is how nonprofits deepen relationships with donors over time. However, reality has demonstrated many instances where organization-donor relationships still fail despite communication. This study takes a unique look at the practice of stewardship in public relations by examining why some donor-nonprofit relationships are unsuccessful. Drawing upon theories of contingency and dialogue as well as concepts related to donor dropout, this paper seeks to apply recent developments in public relations literature to stewardship and donor OPRs. The paper takes a qualitative approach, using semi-structured interviews with 26 donors from nonprofits across the United States to examine their experiences with nonprofits. Inductive analysis found seven key themes relating to stewardship practices that could make or break a donor relationship: Irresponsible Reporting, Meaningless Engagement, Unsanctioned Recognition, Legal and Policy Constraints, Financial Instability, Poor Fit with Mission and Personal Interests, and Social Mismatch. Together, these elements show that donors leave when they do not find opportunities to engage in true dialogue, that good relationships can fail over time, and donor disloyalty is worth further investigation.
为什么关系失败:捐助者对非营利组织管理成功与失败的定义和理解
公共关系管理是非营利组织如何随着时间的推移加深与捐赠者的关系。然而,现实情况表明,尽管进行了沟通,组织与捐助者的关系仍然失败。这项研究通过研究为什么一些捐赠非营利关系不成功,对公共关系中的管理实践进行了独特的审视。本文借鉴偶然性和对话的理论以及与捐赠者辍学有关的概念,试图将公共关系文献的最新发展应用于管理和捐赠者OPR。这篇论文采用了定性的方法,对来自美国各地非营利组织的26名捐赠者进行了半结构化采访,以考察他们在非营利组织中的经历。归纳分析发现,与管理实践有关的七个关键主题可能决定捐赠关系的成败:不负责任的报告、无意义的参与、无条件的承认、法律和政策约束、财务不稳定、与使命和个人利益不符以及社会不匹配。总之,这些因素表明,捐助者在找不到机会进行真正对话时就会离开,良好的关系可能会随着时间的推移而失败,捐助者的不忠行为值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信