Joint recommendations for a total services account as a factor in simplifying contracts

Q1 Medicine
I. Bruns, C. Schade-Brittinger, Frank Wissing, T. Ruppert, Martin Trillsch
{"title":"Joint recommendations for a total services account as a factor in simplifying contracts","authors":"I. Bruns, C. Schade-Brittinger, Frank Wissing, T. Ruppert, Martin Trillsch","doi":"10.3205/000276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of clinical trials is to transfer findings gained from basic research to patients and to result in innovative treatment approaches. Along with basic research, results from clinical trials thus represent a core area of medical advances. As a location for clinical trials, Germany is currently well-positioned and internationally competitive. This is evident in its position as No. 2 in Europe and No. 3 worldwide – behind the US and UK – in clinical trials of pharmaceuticals [1]. Maintaining and further improving this favorable positioning as a location for clinical trials is in the mutual interest of all parties involved in the field of clinical research, patients, trial sites and sponsors of clinical trials. For patients, clinical trials offer opportunities to gain early access to innovative therapy options. In addition to the scientific interest from medical faculties, clinical research is thereby an important aspect for university clinics in Germany as they fulfill their medical care mandate. Their involvement in clinical trials gives physicians the ability to gather experience with new treatment approaches at an early stage and to pass this know-how on to their patients. A location’s clinical research is thus an important competitive factor in terms of international comparison as well. Industry likewise benefits from the favorable research infrastructure in Germany, which provides rapid patient recruitment and outstanding quality of results obtained and can thus contribute to the early approval of new drugs. From the perspective of the authors, it is therefore essential that Germany continues to remain competitive as a location for conducting clinical trials, precisely because the number of clinical trials is decreasing overall. Companies themselves are in international competition internally and externally, which often creates a certain pressure on trial preparation and thus on the start of a clinical trial. To ensure that a clinical trial can begin early, it is essential that contracts related to the trial are concluded quickly and simply, including remuneration for participants and full, transparent and comprehensible coverage of content for the business relationship. The swift agreement of key contractual and budgetary aspects is therefore in the interest of everyone involved. Against this backdrop, the German Association of Medical Faculties (MFT), the German Association of Academic Medical Centers (VUD), the Coordination Center for Clinical Studies (KKS-Netzwerk) and the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa) have held joint discussions regarding an important aspect of the contract negotiations – the cost consideration of clinical trials. As a result of these talks, these organizations have developed and published joint “Recommendations for the preparation of a total services calculation for remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial in a trial center” [2], [3]. The parties concerned share the conviction that, against the backdrops described, it would be helpful if the potential contract partners had access to recommendations that offer examples of constantly recurring cost positions in order to more precisely determine remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial. This article explains how the “Recommendations for the preparation of a total services calculation for remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial in a trial center” [2], [3] were developed and provides an overview of their content.","PeriodicalId":39243,"journal":{"name":"GMS German Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS German Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of clinical trials is to transfer findings gained from basic research to patients and to result in innovative treatment approaches. Along with basic research, results from clinical trials thus represent a core area of medical advances. As a location for clinical trials, Germany is currently well-positioned and internationally competitive. This is evident in its position as No. 2 in Europe and No. 3 worldwide – behind the US and UK – in clinical trials of pharmaceuticals [1]. Maintaining and further improving this favorable positioning as a location for clinical trials is in the mutual interest of all parties involved in the field of clinical research, patients, trial sites and sponsors of clinical trials. For patients, clinical trials offer opportunities to gain early access to innovative therapy options. In addition to the scientific interest from medical faculties, clinical research is thereby an important aspect for university clinics in Germany as they fulfill their medical care mandate. Their involvement in clinical trials gives physicians the ability to gather experience with new treatment approaches at an early stage and to pass this know-how on to their patients. A location’s clinical research is thus an important competitive factor in terms of international comparison as well. Industry likewise benefits from the favorable research infrastructure in Germany, which provides rapid patient recruitment and outstanding quality of results obtained and can thus contribute to the early approval of new drugs. From the perspective of the authors, it is therefore essential that Germany continues to remain competitive as a location for conducting clinical trials, precisely because the number of clinical trials is decreasing overall. Companies themselves are in international competition internally and externally, which often creates a certain pressure on trial preparation and thus on the start of a clinical trial. To ensure that a clinical trial can begin early, it is essential that contracts related to the trial are concluded quickly and simply, including remuneration for participants and full, transparent and comprehensible coverage of content for the business relationship. The swift agreement of key contractual and budgetary aspects is therefore in the interest of everyone involved. Against this backdrop, the German Association of Medical Faculties (MFT), the German Association of Academic Medical Centers (VUD), the Coordination Center for Clinical Studies (KKS-Netzwerk) and the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa) have held joint discussions regarding an important aspect of the contract negotiations – the cost consideration of clinical trials. As a result of these talks, these organizations have developed and published joint “Recommendations for the preparation of a total services calculation for remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial in a trial center” [2], [3]. The parties concerned share the conviction that, against the backdrops described, it would be helpful if the potential contract partners had access to recommendations that offer examples of constantly recurring cost positions in order to more precisely determine remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial. This article explains how the “Recommendations for the preparation of a total services calculation for remuneration related to the conduct of a clinical trial in a trial center” [2], [3] were developed and provides an overview of their content.
联合建议将服务总额帐户作为简化合同的一个因素
临床试验的目的是将从基础研究中获得的发现转移到患者身上,并产生创新的治疗方法。因此,与基础研究一样,临床试验的结果代表了医学进步的一个核心领域。作为临床试验的地点,德国目前处于有利地位,具有国际竞争力。在药物临床试验方面,英国在欧洲排名第二,在全球排名第三(仅次于美国和英国),这一点显而易见。保持并进一步改善这一有利的位置,作为临床试验的地点,符合临床研究领域所有各方、患者、试验地点和临床试验发起者的共同利益。对于患者来说,临床试验提供了早期获得创新治疗方案的机会。除了医学院系的科学兴趣之外,临床研究因此是德国大学诊所履行其医疗保健职责的重要方面。他们参与临床试验,使医生能够在早期阶段收集新治疗方法的经验,并将这些知识传授给患者。因此,就国际比较而言,一个地区的临床研究也是一个重要的竞争因素。行业同样受益于德国有利的研究基础设施,它提供了快速的患者招募和获得的高质量结果,从而有助于新药的早期批准。从作者的角度来看,因此,德国作为开展临床试验的地点继续保持竞争力是至关重要的,因为临床试验的数量总体上正在减少。公司本身在内部和外部都处于国际竞争中,这往往会对试验准备产生一定的压力,从而对临床试验的开始产生一定的压力。为确保早日开始临床试验,必须迅速而简单地缔结与试验有关的合同,包括对参与者的报酬和对业务关系内容的全面、透明和可理解的覆盖。因此,迅速达成关键合同和预算方面的协议符合有关各方的利益。在此背景下,德国医学院协会(MFT)、德国学术医学中心协会(VUD)、临床研究协调中心(KKS-Netzwerk)和德国研究型制药公司协会(vfa)就合同谈判的一个重要方面————临床试验的费用考虑————进行了联合讨论。这些会谈的结果是,这些组织制定并发表了联合“关于编制与在试验中心进行临床试验有关的报酬的总服务计算的建议”[2],[3]。有关各方一致认为,在上述背景下,如果潜在的合同伙伴能够获得提供经常出现的成本状况的例子的建议,以便更准确地确定与进行临床试验有关的报酬,将是有益的。本文解释了“编制与在试验中心进行临床试验有关的报酬的总服务计算的建议”[2],[3]是如何制定的,并概述了其内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GMS German Medical Science
GMS German Medical Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信