Scars on the Land: An Environmental History of Slavery in the American South by David Silkenat (review)

IF 0.8 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
Amanda Van Lanen
{"title":"Scars on the Land: An Environmental History of Slavery in the American South by David Silkenat (review)","authors":"Amanda Van Lanen","doi":"10.1353/jer.2023.a905105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have studied slavery’s history in North Amer i ca from many angles, ranging from regional histories centered on specific crops to broader works that explore gender, transatlantic connections, culture, and economics. David Silkenat’s recent book explores slavery as environmental history. The book is based on the premise that for nearly two hundred years, “the environment fundamentally shaped American slavery, and slavery remade the southern landscape” (2). Southern historians have long been aware of the impacts of slavery on the landscape, dating back to Avery Craven’s 1926 study of soil exhaustion in Virginia and Maryland; however, much of the scholarship has tended to take the form of agricultural rather than environmental history.1 Cash crops and slavery were so intertwined that it is natu ral to place those histories in an agricultural framework. Agriculture is fundamentally connected to the land, so it is impossible to write an agricultural history without considering the environment, but ultimately, environment is not the primary lens in agricultural histories. Silkenat places environment at the center of his study. In doing so, he deftly weaves two hundred years of diverse history from across the region into a thoughtprovoking narrative that synthesizes decades of scholarship on slavery and southern agriculture. The book’s thesis pre sents an in ter est ing dilemma: To what extent was slavery constrained by the environment and to what extent did slavery shape the environment? Building on works by historians such as William","PeriodicalId":45213,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC","volume":"43 1","pages":"511 - 513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE EARLY REPUBLIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jer.2023.a905105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have studied slavery’s history in North Amer i ca from many angles, ranging from regional histories centered on specific crops to broader works that explore gender, transatlantic connections, culture, and economics. David Silkenat’s recent book explores slavery as environmental history. The book is based on the premise that for nearly two hundred years, “the environment fundamentally shaped American slavery, and slavery remade the southern landscape” (2). Southern historians have long been aware of the impacts of slavery on the landscape, dating back to Avery Craven’s 1926 study of soil exhaustion in Virginia and Maryland; however, much of the scholarship has tended to take the form of agricultural rather than environmental history.1 Cash crops and slavery were so intertwined that it is natu ral to place those histories in an agricultural framework. Agriculture is fundamentally connected to the land, so it is impossible to write an agricultural history without considering the environment, but ultimately, environment is not the primary lens in agricultural histories. Silkenat places environment at the center of his study. In doing so, he deftly weaves two hundred years of diverse history from across the region into a thoughtprovoking narrative that synthesizes decades of scholarship on slavery and southern agriculture. The book’s thesis pre sents an in ter est ing dilemma: To what extent was slavery constrained by the environment and to what extent did slavery shape the environment? Building on works by historians such as William
《土地上的伤痕:美国南部奴隶制的环境史》,David Silkenat著(评论)
学者们从多个角度研究了北美奴隶制的历史,从以特定作物为中心的地区历史到探索性别、跨大西洋联系、文化和经济的更广泛的著作。David Silkenat最近的一本书探讨了奴隶制作为环境史的问题。这本书的前提是,近两百年来,“环境从根本上塑造了美国的奴隶制,奴隶制重塑了南方的景观”(2)。南方历史学家早就意识到奴隶制对景观的影响,可以追溯到艾弗里·克雷文1926年对弗吉尼亚州和马里兰州土壤衰竭的研究;然而,大部分学术倾向于采用农业史而非环境史的形式。1经济作物和奴隶制交织在一起,因此将这些历史放在农业框架中是理所当然的。农业从根本上与土地相连,所以写农业史不可能不考虑环境,但归根结底,环境并不是农业史的主要视角。Silkenat把环境放在他研究的中心。在这样做的过程中,他巧妙地将该地区200年的不同历史编织成一个发人深省的叙事,综合了几十年来对奴隶制和南方农业的研究。这本书的论文提出了一个令人困惑的困境:奴隶制在多大程度上受到环境的约束,奴隶制在多小程度上塑造了环境?以威廉等历史学家的作品为基础
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Early Republic is a quarterly journal committed to publishing the best scholarship on the history and culture of the United States in the years of the early republic (1776–1861). JER is published for the Society for Historians of the Early American Republic. SHEAR membership includes an annual subscription to the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信