Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs

IF 2.946 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Mohamed Abou El Hassan, Katherine Huang, Manoja B. K. Eswara, Zhaodong Xu, Tao Yu, Arthur Aubry, Zuyao Ni, Izzy Livne-bar, Monika Sangwan, Mohamad Ahmad, Rod Bremner
{"title":"Properties of STAT1 and IRF1 enhancers and the influence of SNPs","authors":"Mohamed Abou El Hassan,&nbsp;Katherine Huang,&nbsp;Manoja B. K. Eswara,&nbsp;Zhaodong Xu,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Arthur Aubry,&nbsp;Zuyao Ni,&nbsp;Izzy Livne-bar,&nbsp;Monika Sangwan,&nbsp;Mohamad Ahmad,&nbsp;Rod Bremner","doi":"10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>STAT1 and IRF1 collaborate to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) stimulated genes (ISGs), but the extent to which they act alone or together is unclear. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on in vivo binding is also largely unknown.</p><p>We show that IRF1 binds at proximal or distant ISG sites twice as often as STAT1, increasing to sixfold at the MHC class I locus. STAT1 almost always bound with IRF1, while most IRF1 binding events were isolated. Dual binding sites at remote or proximal enhancers distinguished ISGs that were responsive to IFNγ versus cell-specific resistant ISGs, which showed fewer and mainly single binding events. Surprisingly, inducibility in one cell type predicted ISG-responsiveness in other cells. Several dbSNPs overlapped with STAT1 and IRF1 binding motifs, and we developed methodology to rapidly assess their effects. We show that in silico prediction of SNP effects accurately reflects altered binding both in vitro and in vivo.</p><p>These data reveal broad cooperation between STAT1 and IRF1, explain cell type specific differences in ISG-responsiveness, and identify genetic variants that may participate in the pathogenesis of immune disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":497,"journal":{"name":"BMC Molecular Biology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9460,"publicationDate":"2017-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Molecular Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12867-017-0084-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

STAT1 and IRF1 collaborate to induce interferon-γ (IFNγ) stimulated genes (ISGs), but the extent to which they act alone or together is unclear. The effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on in vivo binding is also largely unknown.

We show that IRF1 binds at proximal or distant ISG sites twice as often as STAT1, increasing to sixfold at the MHC class I locus. STAT1 almost always bound with IRF1, while most IRF1 binding events were isolated. Dual binding sites at remote or proximal enhancers distinguished ISGs that were responsive to IFNγ versus cell-specific resistant ISGs, which showed fewer and mainly single binding events. Surprisingly, inducibility in one cell type predicted ISG-responsiveness in other cells. Several dbSNPs overlapped with STAT1 and IRF1 binding motifs, and we developed methodology to rapidly assess their effects. We show that in silico prediction of SNP effects accurately reflects altered binding both in vitro and in vivo.

These data reveal broad cooperation between STAT1 and IRF1, explain cell type specific differences in ISG-responsiveness, and identify genetic variants that may participate in the pathogenesis of immune disorders.

Abstract Image

STAT1和IRF1增强子的特性及snp的影响
STAT1和IRF1共同诱导干扰素γ (IFNγ)刺激基因(ISGs),但它们单独或共同作用的程度尚不清楚。单核苷酸多态性(snp)对体内结合的影响在很大程度上也是未知的。我们发现IRF1在近端或远端ISG位点的结合频率是STAT1的两倍,在MHC I类位点的结合频率增加到六倍。STAT1几乎总是与IRF1结合,而大多数IRF1结合事件是分离的。远端或近端增强子的双结合位点区分了对IFNγ有反应的isg和细胞特异性耐药的isg,后者显示较少且主要是单结合事件。令人惊讶的是,一种细胞的诱导性预测了其他细胞的isg反应性。几个dbsnp与STAT1和IRF1结合基序重叠,我们开发了快速评估其影响的方法。我们表明,对SNP效应的计算机预测准确地反映了体外和体内结合的改变。这些数据揭示了STAT1和IRF1之间的广泛合作,解释了isg反应性的细胞类型特异性差异,并确定了可能参与免疫疾病发病机制的遗传变异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Molecular Biology
BMC Molecular Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Molecular Biology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of DNA and RNA in a cellular context, encompassing investigations of chromatin, replication, recombination, mutation, repair, transcription, translation and RNA processing and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信