The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) from a Civil Procedure Perspective

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Laws Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.3390/laws12010015
Shahrul Mizan Ismail, Ali Ibrahim Alheji
{"title":"The Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) from a Civil Procedure Perspective","authors":"Shahrul Mizan Ismail, Ali Ibrahim Alheji","doi":"10.3390/laws12010015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terrorism is a global threat that has caused immense suffering and loss of life. The United States’ Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) is an important piece of legislation that allows victims of terrorism to hold foreign entities accountable for their actions. However, there is a need to evaluate the act from the perspective of Civil Procedure to determine its effectiveness in providing remedies for victims and addressing the challenges of holding foreign entities accountable. This paper’s analysis is based on the JASTA, for the evaluation of its position and application from a pre-litigation of Civil Procedure perspective. The two most significant parts of Civil Procedure in the segments of preliminary issues including Parties to the Suit and Cause of Action are examined to determine their susceptibility to being exploited in the process of executing the intention and purpose of the act concerning foreign entities, as highlighted in JASTA. Preliminary aspects must be considered before initiating a civil suit based on JASTA. This analysis is important in understanding the strength and weaknesses of JASTA in the civil suit and it involves a qualitative method of research. For the most part, the research methodology adopted will be pure legal research. Since the research will focus on JASTA, the regular method of analysis adopted is by referring to the sources and data discussing JASTA and procedural law. The findings of this work could be used to establish better laws from JASTA and provide the opportunity for the citizens who are victims to bring legal action against foreign states that are also responsible for their loss and suffering. Moreover, other countries faced with litigation initiated under JASTA could also benefit from the findings as they could be used in establishing better laws for countries that had also suffered greatly due to actions resulting from terrorism or the war against terrorism. Future research related to this topic is also recommended in this analysis.","PeriodicalId":30534,"journal":{"name":"Laws","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12010015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrorism is a global threat that has caused immense suffering and loss of life. The United States’ Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) is an important piece of legislation that allows victims of terrorism to hold foreign entities accountable for their actions. However, there is a need to evaluate the act from the perspective of Civil Procedure to determine its effectiveness in providing remedies for victims and addressing the challenges of holding foreign entities accountable. This paper’s analysis is based on the JASTA, for the evaluation of its position and application from a pre-litigation of Civil Procedure perspective. The two most significant parts of Civil Procedure in the segments of preliminary issues including Parties to the Suit and Cause of Action are examined to determine their susceptibility to being exploited in the process of executing the intention and purpose of the act concerning foreign entities, as highlighted in JASTA. Preliminary aspects must be considered before initiating a civil suit based on JASTA. This analysis is important in understanding the strength and weaknesses of JASTA in the civil suit and it involves a qualitative method of research. For the most part, the research methodology adopted will be pure legal research. Since the research will focus on JASTA, the regular method of analysis adopted is by referring to the sources and data discussing JASTA and procedural law. The findings of this work could be used to establish better laws from JASTA and provide the opportunity for the citizens who are victims to bring legal action against foreign states that are also responsible for their loss and suffering. Moreover, other countries faced with litigation initiated under JASTA could also benefit from the findings as they could be used in establishing better laws for countries that had also suffered greatly due to actions resulting from terrorism or the war against terrorism. Future research related to this topic is also recommended in this analysis.
民事诉讼视角下的《反恐怖主义支持者司法法》
恐怖主义是一种全球性威胁,造成了巨大的痛苦和生命损失。美国的《反恐怖主义赞助者司法法》是一项重要的立法,允许恐怖主义受害者追究外国实体对其行为的责任。然而,有必要从民事诉讼的角度对该法案进行评估,以确定其在为受害者提供补救和应对追究外国实体责任的挑战方面的有效性。本文的分析是基于JASTA,从诉前民事诉讼的角度来评价其地位和适用性。如JASTA所强调的,民事诉讼程序中包括诉讼当事人和诉讼原因在内的初步问题部分中最重要的两个部分被审查,以确定它们在执行涉及外国实体的行为的意图和目的的过程中容易被利用。在根据JASTA提起民事诉讼之前,必须考虑初步方面。这一分析对于理解JASTA在民事诉讼中的优势和劣势很重要,它涉及一种定性的研究方法。在大多数情况下,所采用的研究方法将是纯粹的法律研究。由于研究将集中在JASTA上,因此采用的常规分析方法是参考讨论JASTA和程序法的来源和数据。这项工作的结果可用于从JASTA制定更好的法律,并为受害者公民提供机会,对同样应对其损失和痛苦负责的外国提起法律诉讼。此外,面临根据JASTA提起诉讼的其他国家也可以从调查结果中受益,因为这些结果可以用于为那些也因恐怖主义或反恐战争而遭受巨大损失的国家制定更好的法律。在本分析中还建议了与该主题相关的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laws
Laws LAW-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信