Italian validation of the Manchester Triage System towards short-term mortality: a prospective observational study

IF 0.4 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
A. Zaboli, S. Sibilio, A. Cipriano, Naria Park, A. Bonora, N. Pfeifer, A. Giudiceandrea, F. Brigo, G. Turcato
{"title":"Italian validation of the Manchester Triage System towards short-term mortality: a prospective observational study","authors":"A. Zaboli, S. Sibilio, A. Cipriano, Naria Park, A. Bonora, N. Pfeifer, A. Giudiceandrea, F. Brigo, G. Turcato","doi":"10.4081/ecj.2023.11443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to validate the Manchester Triage System in a hospital setting using data for short- and medium-term death rates. A prospective observational study was conducted at the Emergency Department of Merano Hospital for two years. The discriminatory ability of MTS was tested using AUROCs and contingency tables, reporting sensitivity and specificity levels for each study outcome. A total of 98,443 patients were enrolled, 237 of whom died within 72h; 422 patients died within seven days, and 1025 died within 30 days. The MTS demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability, reporting AUROC values of 0.890 for death within 72h, 0.853 for death within seven days, and 0.781 for death within 30 days. A sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 79.4% were reported for death at 72h, while a sensitivity of 69.6% and a specificity of 79.8% were reported for death at 30 days. The MTS has proven to be a good triage system capable of accurately identifying patients who are at risk of death in the short or medium term.","PeriodicalId":51984,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Care Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Care Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/ecj.2023.11443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study aimed to validate the Manchester Triage System in a hospital setting using data for short- and medium-term death rates. A prospective observational study was conducted at the Emergency Department of Merano Hospital for two years. The discriminatory ability of MTS was tested using AUROCs and contingency tables, reporting sensitivity and specificity levels for each study outcome. A total of 98,443 patients were enrolled, 237 of whom died within 72h; 422 patients died within seven days, and 1025 died within 30 days. The MTS demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability, reporting AUROC values of 0.890 for death within 72h, 0.853 for death within seven days, and 0.781 for death within 30 days. A sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 79.4% were reported for death at 72h, while a sensitivity of 69.6% and a specificity of 79.8% were reported for death at 30 days. The MTS has proven to be a good triage system capable of accurately identifying patients who are at risk of death in the short or medium term.
意大利对曼彻斯特分诊系统短期死亡率的验证:一项前瞻性观察研究
该研究旨在利用短期和中期死亡率数据验证曼彻斯特分诊系统在医院的应用。在Merano医院急诊科进行了一项为期两年的前瞻性观察研究。使用auroc和列联表测试MTS的区分能力,报告每个研究结果的敏感性和特异性水平。共纳入98,443例患者,其中237例在72小时内死亡;422名患者在7天内死亡,1025名患者在30天内死亡。MTS表现出极好的区分能力,报告72小时内死亡的AUROC值为0.890,7天内死亡的AUROC值为0.853,30天内死亡的AUROC值为0.781。72小时死亡的敏感性为87.7%,特异性为79.4%,30天死亡的敏感性为69.6%,特异性为79.8%。MTS已被证明是一个很好的分诊系统,能够准确识别短期或中期有死亡风险的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Care Journal
Emergency Care Journal EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
60.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信