Los orígenes históricos de las reglas sobre comunicabilidad de las circunstancias modificatorias del Código Penal chileno: antecedentes en la codificación napolitana y en el derecho romano
{"title":"Los orígenes históricos de las reglas sobre comunicabilidad de las circunstancias modificatorias del Código Penal chileno: antecedentes en la codificación napolitana y en el derecho romano","authors":"Z. Cortés, J. Luis","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen La aplicacion literal del articulo 64 del Codigo Penal chileno, relevante en cuanto que establece reglas vinculadas con el pro blema de la comunicabilidad y por su rol como modelo de los recientes proyectos de reforma integral, justifica la pregunta por sus antecedentes historicos. Sus origenes se pueden rastrear finalmente hasta el derecho romano, pasando por el modelo habitual de la codificacion nacional (el Codigo espanol de 1848 reformado en 1850) y por la codificacion napolitana de 1819. La evolucion observada pone de manifiesto que el esfuerzo generalizador requirio de reglas que acojan tanto la incomunicabilidad como la comunicabilidad, para distintos supuestos, sin perjuicio de mostrar una vinculacion con hipotesis que hoy reciben un tratamiento especial y separado. EnglishAbstract A quest for the historical background of Article 64 of the Chilean Criminal Code (legal provision significant as it deals with the so-called problem of “communicability” and as a model for recent proposals of legal reform) is justified because it is interpreted based on the literal meaning of its wording. Its origins can be traced back eventually to Roman Law, through the usual model of the national legislation (the Spanish Code of 1848 as amended in 1850) and through the Neapolitan codification of 1819. This evolution underlines that the process of setting up regulations of a general nature required different rules applicable under different circumstances, respectively allowing and blocking the “communicability” effect. Furthermore, this quest shows how these origins are related to cases subject currently to a particular and different regulation.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552020000100499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolResumen La aplicacion literal del articulo 64 del Codigo Penal chileno, relevante en cuanto que establece reglas vinculadas con el pro blema de la comunicabilidad y por su rol como modelo de los recientes proyectos de reforma integral, justifica la pregunta por sus antecedentes historicos. Sus origenes se pueden rastrear finalmente hasta el derecho romano, pasando por el modelo habitual de la codificacion nacional (el Codigo espanol de 1848 reformado en 1850) y por la codificacion napolitana de 1819. La evolucion observada pone de manifiesto que el esfuerzo generalizador requirio de reglas que acojan tanto la incomunicabilidad como la comunicabilidad, para distintos supuestos, sin perjuicio de mostrar una vinculacion con hipotesis que hoy reciben un tratamiento especial y separado. EnglishAbstract A quest for the historical background of Article 64 of the Chilean Criminal Code (legal provision significant as it deals with the so-called problem of “communicability” and as a model for recent proposals of legal reform) is justified because it is interpreted based on the literal meaning of its wording. Its origins can be traced back eventually to Roman Law, through the usual model of the national legislation (the Spanish Code of 1848 as amended in 1850) and through the Neapolitan codification of 1819. This evolution underlines that the process of setting up regulations of a general nature required different rules applicable under different circumstances, respectively allowing and blocking the “communicability” effect. Furthermore, this quest shows how these origins are related to cases subject currently to a particular and different regulation.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.