Effect of Occupation-Based Intervention Using the ADOC-H Combined With Physical Function-Based Intervention on Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1177/15691861231187240
Wataru Kukizaki, Kanta Ohno, Michio Maruta, Suguru Shimokihara, Hiroyuki Iida, Takayuki Tabira
{"title":"Effect of Occupation-Based Intervention Using the ADOC-H Combined With Physical Function-Based Intervention on Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.","authors":"Wataru Kukizaki, Kanta Ohno, Michio Maruta, Suguru Shimokihara, Hiroyuki Iida, Takayuki Tabira","doi":"10.1177/15691861231187240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Occupation-based intervention (OBI) involves daily and meaningful activities for evaluation and intervention. Recently, the \"aid for decision-making in occupation choice for hand\" (ADOC-H) was developed to facilitate OBI in patients with hand injuries. We aimed to examine the efficacy of OBI using the ADOC-H combined with physical function-based interventions (PBI) for patients with distal radius fractures (DRF).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with DRF were retrospectively allocated to two groups, ADOC-H group (<i>n</i> = 14) and PBI group (<i>n</i> = 14), and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Improvements in the Pain Catastrophizing Scale magnification and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the ADOC-H group than in the PBI group (<i>p</i> < .05). The groups showed no differences in measure of physical function, such as range of motion and grip strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OBI using the ADOC-H combined with PBI is clinically useful for patients with DRF as it promotes use of the injured hand for daily activities in a step-by-step approach, improving psychological difficulties in using the hand.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10680855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861231187240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Occupation-based intervention (OBI) involves daily and meaningful activities for evaluation and intervention. Recently, the "aid for decision-making in occupation choice for hand" (ADOC-H) was developed to facilitate OBI in patients with hand injuries. We aimed to examine the efficacy of OBI using the ADOC-H combined with physical function-based interventions (PBI) for patients with distal radius fractures (DRF).

Material and methods: Patients with DRF were retrospectively allocated to two groups, ADOC-H group (n = 14) and PBI group (n = 14), and compared.

Results: Improvements in the Pain Catastrophizing Scale magnification and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the ADOC-H group than in the PBI group (p < .05). The groups showed no differences in measure of physical function, such as range of motion and grip strength.

Conclusion: OBI using the ADOC-H combined with PBI is clinically useful for patients with DRF as it promotes use of the injured hand for daily activities in a step-by-step approach, improving psychological difficulties in using the hand.

分享
查看原文
基于职业的ADOC-H联合基于身体功能的干预对桡骨远端骨折患者的影响:回顾性病例对照研究
基于职业的干预(OBI)包括日常和有意义的评估和干预活动。最近,开发了“手部职业选择决策辅助工具”(ADOC-H),以促进手部损伤患者的OBI。我们的目的是检查使用ADOC-H联合基于身体功能的干预措施(PBI)对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)患者进行OBI的疗效。DRF患者被回顾性地分为两组,ADOC-H组(n=14)和PBI组(n=14),并进行比较。ADOC-H组的疼痛灾难量表放大倍数、医院焦虑和抑郁量表以及手臂、肩膀和手部残疾问卷得分的改善显著高于PBI组(p<0.05)。两组在运动范围和握力等身体功能指标上没有差异。使用ADOC-H和PBI的OBI对DRF患者具有临床实用性,因为它可以促进受伤手以循序渐进的方式进行日常活动,改善使用手的心理困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信