The complexity of situated text design: a negotiation between standardization and spoken language in a manufacturing company

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Anna-Lena Carlsson, Natalia Svensson Harari
{"title":"The complexity of situated text design: a negotiation between standardization and spoken language in a manufacturing company","authors":"Anna-Lena Carlsson, Natalia Svensson Harari","doi":"10.3389/fcomm.2023.1062733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In information design textbooks, text design is mostly understood as typography and layout. The meaning-making process of language, involving social interaction that affects language, is rarely acknowledged. Instead, texts are supposed to be “clearly” written. In this research article, we argue that the understanding of text design could benefit from also addressing text production and use situated amid social activity. This article presents a study on a text design process partly based on spoken language and owned by assembly operators in a workplace. Capturing the spoken dialogue and transforming it into instructive texts resembling transcripts are essential steps in securing the best practices for the smallest tasks in manual assembly, the minima of working, which is crucial for manufacturing. Our aim within the information design field is 2-fold: To underline the meaning-making process in language as a social phenomenon and to show that the situated design perspective, i.e., an outlook that highlights the uniqueness of the setting, can be important for the production and use of certain texts, such as instructions, and for affecting language. We asked ourselves: What are the consequences for the information design field when meaning-making in a language is understood as being socially situated in an activity? We have studied a design process and used observations, interviews, and text analysis to gather data. The result showed that the workers' ownership of text documents is crucial for the texts' use, yet the texts used do not meet the standard of information design textbooks. Moreover, the design of the text involves a continuous and non-linear collective negotiation that balances standardization in language and work procedures with the incorporation of operators' linguistic improvements. We unfold a case of text design where there is a closeness of designer and user roles, a non-linearity of the process, and an understanding of an information design product as becoming rather than having been finalized for use.","PeriodicalId":31739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1062733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In information design textbooks, text design is mostly understood as typography and layout. The meaning-making process of language, involving social interaction that affects language, is rarely acknowledged. Instead, texts are supposed to be “clearly” written. In this research article, we argue that the understanding of text design could benefit from also addressing text production and use situated amid social activity. This article presents a study on a text design process partly based on spoken language and owned by assembly operators in a workplace. Capturing the spoken dialogue and transforming it into instructive texts resembling transcripts are essential steps in securing the best practices for the smallest tasks in manual assembly, the minima of working, which is crucial for manufacturing. Our aim within the information design field is 2-fold: To underline the meaning-making process in language as a social phenomenon and to show that the situated design perspective, i.e., an outlook that highlights the uniqueness of the setting, can be important for the production and use of certain texts, such as instructions, and for affecting language. We asked ourselves: What are the consequences for the information design field when meaning-making in a language is understood as being socially situated in an activity? We have studied a design process and used observations, interviews, and text analysis to gather data. The result showed that the workers' ownership of text documents is crucial for the texts' use, yet the texts used do not meet the standard of information design textbooks. Moreover, the design of the text involves a continuous and non-linear collective negotiation that balances standardization in language and work procedures with the incorporation of operators' linguistic improvements. We unfold a case of text design where there is a closeness of designer and user roles, a non-linearity of the process, and an understanding of an information design product as becoming rather than having been finalized for use.
情境文本设计的复杂性:一家制造企业的标准化与口语化谈判
在信息设计教科书中,文本设计通常被理解为排版和布局。语言的意义形成过程,包括影响语言的社会互动,很少得到承认。相反,文本应该写得“清楚”。在这篇研究文章中,我们认为对文本设计的理解也可以从解决社会活动中的文本生产和使用中受益。本文介绍了一个部分基于口语的文本设计过程的研究,该过程由工作场所的装配操作员拥有。捕获口头对话并将其转换为类似成绩单的有指导意义的文本是确保手工组装中最小任务的最佳实践的必要步骤,这是最小的工作,这对制造业至关重要。我们在信息设计领域的目标是双重的:强调作为一种社会现象的语言的意义形成过程,并表明所处的设计视角,即强调环境独特性的观点,对于某些文本(如说明)的生产和使用以及对语言的影响是重要的。我们问自己:当一种语言的意义形成被理解为一种社会活动时,对信息设计领域的影响是什么?我们研究了一个设计过程,并使用观察、访谈和文本分析来收集数据。结果表明,工作者对文本文件的所有权对文本的使用至关重要,但使用的文本不符合信息设计教科书的标准。此外,文本的设计涉及一个连续和非线性的集体谈判,以平衡语言和工作程序的标准化与运营商的语言改进的结合。我们展示了一个文本设计的案例,其中存在设计师和用户角色的密切关系,过程的非线性,以及对信息设计产品的理解,因为它正在成为而不是已经最终确定用于使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
284
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信