The effect of Science Process Skills of Students Argumentation Skills

D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Elza Triani
{"title":"The effect of Science Process Skills of Students Argumentation Skills","authors":"D. Darmaji, A. Astalini, D. A. Kurniawan*, Elza Triani","doi":"10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the comparison of students' learning skills in each class and students' argumentative abilities in each class and to determine the effect of students' science process skills on students' argumentation abilities. This type of research is using the Mixed Method with an explanatory design. The number of samples studied were 70 students of class 11 science. With the sampling technique of simple random sampling. The results of data analysis using parametric statistics t test obtained sig value. (2-tailed) 0.034 0.05, so it can be said that the students' argumentative abilities in XI IPA 4 and IPA 1 are different, and for the variable science process skills students get sig. (2-tailed) 0.043 0.05 so that the students' science process skills in each class are different. The results of the regression test obtained the results of the sig value. 0.025 in class XI IPA 1 and class XI IPA 4 obtained a sig value. 0.030 where the value of sig. The means that the skills affect the students' argumentation skills, this is also the result of the interviews conducted. The conclusion is that improving the good skills of students will make students better in conveying their arguments.","PeriodicalId":30901,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.49224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study aims to determine the comparison of students' learning skills in each class and students' argumentative abilities in each class and to determine the effect of students' science process skills on students' argumentation abilities. This type of research is using the Mixed Method with an explanatory design. The number of samples studied were 70 students of class 11 science. With the sampling technique of simple random sampling. The results of data analysis using parametric statistics t test obtained sig value. (2-tailed) 0.034 0.05, so it can be said that the students' argumentative abilities in XI IPA 4 and IPA 1 are different, and for the variable science process skills students get sig. (2-tailed) 0.043 0.05 so that the students' science process skills in each class are different. The results of the regression test obtained the results of the sig value. 0.025 in class XI IPA 1 and class XI IPA 4 obtained a sig value. 0.030 where the value of sig. The means that the skills affect the students' argumentation skills, this is also the result of the interviews conducted. The conclusion is that improving the good skills of students will make students better in conveying their arguments.
科学过程技能对学生论证技能的影响
本研究旨在确定每节课学生的学习技能与每节课的议论文能力的比较,并确定学生的科学过程技能对学生议论文能力产生的影响。这种类型的研究是使用混合方法和解释性设计。研究的样本数量为科学11班的70名学生。采用简单随机抽样的抽样技术。使用参数统计t检验的数据分析结果得到sig值。(2尾)0.034 0.05,可以说XI IPA 4和IPA 1学生的议论文能力不同,对于可变的科学过程技能,学生得到了sig。(2尾)0.043.05,使得每个班学生的科学处理技能不同。回归测试的结果得到了sig值的结果。XI级IPA 1和XI级IPA 4中的0.025获得sig值。0.030,其中sig。这意味着技能会影响学生的论证能力,这也是面试的结果。结论是,提高学生的良好技能将使学生更好地传达他们的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信