Interpreting logit models

IF 3.2 2区 数学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
L. J. Uberti
{"title":"Interpreting logit models","authors":"L. J. Uberti","doi":"10.1177/1536867X221083855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parameters of logit models are typically difficult to interpret, and the applied literature is replete with interpretive and computational mistakes. In this article, I review a menu of options to interpret the results of logistic regressions correctly and effectively using Stata. I consider marginal effects, partial effects, (contrasts of) predictive margins, elasticities, and odds and risk ratios. I also show that interaction terms are typically easier to interpret in practice than implied by the recent literature on this topic.","PeriodicalId":51171,"journal":{"name":"Stata Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stata Journal","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X221083855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The parameters of logit models are typically difficult to interpret, and the applied literature is replete with interpretive and computational mistakes. In this article, I review a menu of options to interpret the results of logistic regressions correctly and effectively using Stata. I consider marginal effects, partial effects, (contrasts of) predictive margins, elasticities, and odds and risk ratios. I also show that interaction terms are typically easier to interpret in practice than implied by the recent literature on this topic.
解释logit模型
logit模型的参数通常难以解释,应用文献中充满了解释和计算错误。在本文中,我回顾了使用Stata正确有效地解释逻辑回归结果的选项菜单。我考虑了边际效应、部分效应、预测边际(对比)、弹性、几率和风险比。我还表明,交互术语在实践中通常比最近关于该主题的文献所暗示的更容易解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stata Journal
Stata Journal 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Stata Journal is a quarterly publication containing articles about statistics, data analysis, teaching methods, and effective use of Stata''s language. The Stata Journal publishes reviewed papers together with shorter notes and comments, regular columns, book reviews, and other material of interest to researchers applying statistics in a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信