Public views of the value, potential, and sustainability of energy sources over the last 30 years in the Pacific Northwest, USA

Q2 Social Sciences
R. Mahler
{"title":"Public views of the value, potential, and sustainability of energy sources over the last 30 years in the Pacific Northwest, USA","authors":"R. Mahler","doi":"10.2495/eq-v7-n1-48-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the use of renewable energy has been an important topic in the four Pacific northwestern states for the last 30 years. large, statistically designed public surveys were conducted in the region in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 to determine the perceived sustainability, future viability, and acceptance of the following ten energy sources: biomass, coal, geothermal, hydropower, natural gas, nuclear, oil, solar, tidal, and wind power. the survey questions were identical in all 4 years of the survey. these surveys were delivered by the us Postal service to over 3500 randomly chosen residents in each survey year. the public response rate exceeded 50% in each survey year. demographic data about age, gender, education level, community size, and state of residence of survey respondents were also collected. the survey data were statistically analyzed. in general, the public was literate identifying the renewable and nonrenewable energy sources as the majority of survey respondents correctly identified biomass, geothermal, hydropower, solar, and wind as renewable energy sources. based on survey results, over 75% of Pacific northwest residents considered it important or very important that their energy resources were renewable in 2020. the findings of this study were important because it shows that the public is in line with the scientific community with the goal of greatly reducing energy reliance on c containing nonrenewable energy sources including oil, coal, and natural gas. in summary, (1) the public strongly supports the transformation to a sustainable energy system using primarily renewable energy sources, (2) the use of traditional nonrenewable energy sources like natural gas should not be discouraged in the present; however, they should be phased out over the short and medium terms, (3) solar and wind energy should be significant sources to meet future energy needs in the region, and (4) the renewables including biomass and geothermal have a place in the future energy mix within the Pacific northwest.","PeriodicalId":52236,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Production and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Production and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/eq-v7-n1-48-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the use of renewable energy has been an important topic in the four Pacific northwestern states for the last 30 years. large, statistically designed public surveys were conducted in the region in 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 to determine the perceived sustainability, future viability, and acceptance of the following ten energy sources: biomass, coal, geothermal, hydropower, natural gas, nuclear, oil, solar, tidal, and wind power. the survey questions were identical in all 4 years of the survey. these surveys were delivered by the us Postal service to over 3500 randomly chosen residents in each survey year. the public response rate exceeded 50% in each survey year. demographic data about age, gender, education level, community size, and state of residence of survey respondents were also collected. the survey data were statistically analyzed. in general, the public was literate identifying the renewable and nonrenewable energy sources as the majority of survey respondents correctly identified biomass, geothermal, hydropower, solar, and wind as renewable energy sources. based on survey results, over 75% of Pacific northwest residents considered it important or very important that their energy resources were renewable in 2020. the findings of this study were important because it shows that the public is in line with the scientific community with the goal of greatly reducing energy reliance on c containing nonrenewable energy sources including oil, coal, and natural gas. in summary, (1) the public strongly supports the transformation to a sustainable energy system using primarily renewable energy sources, (2) the use of traditional nonrenewable energy sources like natural gas should not be discouraged in the present; however, they should be phased out over the short and medium terms, (3) solar and wind energy should be significant sources to meet future energy needs in the region, and (4) the renewables including biomass and geothermal have a place in the future energy mix within the Pacific northwest.
公众对美国西北太平洋地区过去30年能源价值、潜力和可持续性的看法
在过去的30年里,可再生能源的使用一直是太平洋西北四个州的一个重要话题。我们分别于1990年、2000年、2010年和2020年在该地区进行了大规模的、统计设计的公众调查,以确定以下十种能源的可持续性、未来可行性和接受程度:生物质能、煤炭、地热、水电、天然气、核能、石油、太阳能、潮汐能和风能。4年的调查问题都是一样的。这些调查是由美国邮政每年随机选择3500多名居民进行的。每年的公众回应率均超过50%。调查对象的年龄、性别、受教育程度、社区规模和居住地等人口统计数据也被收集。对调查数据进行统计分析。总的来说,公众对可再生能源和不可再生能源的识别是有素养的,因为大多数调查对象正确地将生物质、地热、水电、太阳能和风能识别为可再生能源。根据调查结果,超过75%的太平洋西北部居民认为2020年他们的能源是可再生的是重要的或非常重要的。这项研究的发现很重要,因为它表明公众与科学界的目标是一致的,即大大减少对含不可再生能源(包括石油、煤炭和天然气)的能源依赖。综上所述,(1)公众强烈支持向以可再生能源为主的可持续能源系统转型;(2)目前不应阻碍天然气等传统不可再生能源的使用;然而,它们应该在中短期内逐步淘汰,(3)太阳能和风能应该是满足该地区未来能源需求的重要来源,(4)包括生物质能和地热在内的可再生能源在太平洋西北地区未来的能源结构中占有一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Energy Production and Management
International Journal of Energy Production and Management Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信