William Empson and C. S. Lewis: The Atonement

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 POETRY
Rumrich
{"title":"William Empson and C. S. Lewis: The Atonement","authors":"Rumrich","doi":"10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Literary critics, Milton scholars in particular, tend to register C. S. Lewis and William Empson as opposites on account of their sharply contrasting views about Christianity. Although Lewis had been an atheist as a young man, he converted to Christianity around 1930. Empson, too, may be said to have undergone an adult conversion around the same time—from the mere atheism of his youth to an increasingly strident anti-Christianity. His critical writings repeatedly describe belief in hell and atonement through Christ's sacrifice as sadistic. Lewis, for his part, enjoys widespread fame precisely for his popular writings in rational defense of Christian theology. Despite their indeed striking differences, there is more common ground between them as literary critics than is generally recognized, even when it comes to Christian theology and specifically the doctrine of the Atonement.","PeriodicalId":42710,"journal":{"name":"Milton Studies","volume":"63 1","pages":"62 - 76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Milton Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/MILTONSTUDIES.63.1.0062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

abstract:Literary critics, Milton scholars in particular, tend to register C. S. Lewis and William Empson as opposites on account of their sharply contrasting views about Christianity. Although Lewis had been an atheist as a young man, he converted to Christianity around 1930. Empson, too, may be said to have undergone an adult conversion around the same time—from the mere atheism of his youth to an increasingly strident anti-Christianity. His critical writings repeatedly describe belief in hell and atonement through Christ's sacrifice as sadistic. Lewis, for his part, enjoys widespread fame precisely for his popular writings in rational defense of Christian theology. Despite their indeed striking differences, there is more common ground between them as literary critics than is generally recognized, even when it comes to Christian theology and specifically the doctrine of the Atonement.
威廉·恩普森和C.S.刘易斯:赎罪
摘要:文学评论家,尤其是米尔顿的学者,倾向于将C.S.刘易斯和William Empson视为对立的,因为他们对基督教的看法截然不同。尽管刘易斯年轻时是个无神论者,但他在1930年左右皈依了基督教。可以说,大约在同一时间,恩普森也经历了一次成人皈依——从年轻时的无神论转变为越来越强烈的反基督教。他的批评性著作一再将对地狱的信仰和通过基督的牺牲赎罪描述为虐待狂。就刘易斯而言,正是因为他为基督教神学进行理性辩护的通俗著作而享有广泛的声誉。尽管他们确实存在显著的差异,但作为文学评论家,他们之间的共同点比人们普遍认为的要多,即使是在基督教神学,特别是赎罪教义方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Milton Studies
Milton Studies POETRY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Milton Studies is published annually by the University of Pittsburgh Press as a forum for Milton scholarship and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信