Role of Posterior Interfacetal Distraction and Grafting in Complex Atlanto-Axial Dislocation

M. El-Gaidi, M. Khattab
{"title":"Role of Posterior Interfacetal Distraction and Grafting in Complex Atlanto-Axial Dislocation","authors":"M. El-Gaidi, M. Khattab","doi":"10.21608/esj.2020.20148.1115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background data: Atlanto-axial fixation, unlike subaxial spine, is still challenging due to complex topographical anatomy. Nowadays, atlas lateral mass screws and transpedicular axis screws fixation is a well-accepted technique for the management of atlantaoaxial instability due to their rigid fixation and higher fusion rate. However, in complex cases like basilar invagination, further reduction and proper bony alignment is needed. Study design: a retrospective descriptive clinical case series. Objective: The aim of this work was to assess the safety and efficiency of bilateral posterior atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and insertion of spacer in reducing complex cases of atlantoaxial instability. Patients and methods: Out of 17 patients with atlanto-axial instability, five patients underwent posterior fixation and atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and insertion of spacer for reduction of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Clinical results were evaluated by using the criteria of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System for Cervical Myelopathy (JOA score). The surgical technique, results and morbidity and mortality were assessed. Results: There were 3 females and 2 males; the age ranged from 10y-50y). The cause of significant instability was trauma (2 patients), while each of the 3 other patients suffered from Down syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and post tuberculous infection. All 5 patients had pyramidal tract compression manifestations. At the end of follow up (mean 18m), the average preoperative JOA score improved from 13.2 ± 1 SD to 15.9 ± 0.2 SD (p = 0.04) and the average recovery rate was 69% ± 12 % SD. Postoperative CT scans showed the mean atlantodens interval improved from 6.2mm ± 1.6 to 1.8mm ± 0.8 (p = 0.04), the mean clivus-canal angle increased from 119.8° ± 3.7° to 135.2° ± 7°(p = 0.04). The average extra time and blood loss of bilateral facet distraction and grafting was about 65m (p value = 0.004) and 72.5 ml respectively. There was no mortality, vertebral artery injury, CSF leak or construct failure. Conclusions: Bilateral posterior atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and placement of spacer is a safe and effective adjunct procedure for reduction of complex atlanto-axial instability.","PeriodicalId":11610,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/esj.2020.20148.1115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background data: Atlanto-axial fixation, unlike subaxial spine, is still challenging due to complex topographical anatomy. Nowadays, atlas lateral mass screws and transpedicular axis screws fixation is a well-accepted technique for the management of atlantaoaxial instability due to their rigid fixation and higher fusion rate. However, in complex cases like basilar invagination, further reduction and proper bony alignment is needed. Study design: a retrospective descriptive clinical case series. Objective: The aim of this work was to assess the safety and efficiency of bilateral posterior atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and insertion of spacer in reducing complex cases of atlantoaxial instability. Patients and methods: Out of 17 patients with atlanto-axial instability, five patients underwent posterior fixation and atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and insertion of spacer for reduction of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Clinical results were evaluated by using the criteria of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scoring System for Cervical Myelopathy (JOA score). The surgical technique, results and morbidity and mortality were assessed. Results: There were 3 females and 2 males; the age ranged from 10y-50y). The cause of significant instability was trauma (2 patients), while each of the 3 other patients suffered from Down syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis and post tuberculous infection. All 5 patients had pyramidal tract compression manifestations. At the end of follow up (mean 18m), the average preoperative JOA score improved from 13.2 ± 1 SD to 15.9 ± 0.2 SD (p = 0.04) and the average recovery rate was 69% ± 12 % SD. Postoperative CT scans showed the mean atlantodens interval improved from 6.2mm ± 1.6 to 1.8mm ± 0.8 (p = 0.04), the mean clivus-canal angle increased from 119.8° ± 3.7° to 135.2° ± 7°(p = 0.04). The average extra time and blood loss of bilateral facet distraction and grafting was about 65m (p value = 0.004) and 72.5 ml respectively. There was no mortality, vertebral artery injury, CSF leak or construct failure. Conclusions: Bilateral posterior atlanto-axial facet joint distraction and placement of spacer is a safe and effective adjunct procedure for reduction of complex atlanto-axial instability.
后股关节间牵张和移植物在复杂寰枢椎脱位中的作用
背景资料:寰枢椎内固定与轴下脊柱不同,由于复杂的地形解剖结构,仍然具有挑战性。目前,寰枢椎侧块螺钉和椎弓根螺钉固定是一种公认的治疗寰枢椎不稳定的技术,因为它们固定牢固,融合率高。然而,在复杂的情况下,如基底动脉内陷,需要进一步复位和适当的骨对齐。研究设计:回顾性描述性临床病例系列。目的:本研究旨在评估双侧寰枢椎后小关节撑开并插入垫片在减少复杂性寰枢椎不稳定病例中的安全性和有效性。患者和方法:在17例寰枢椎不稳定患者中,5例患者接受了寰枢椎小关节后固定和牵引并插入垫片以复位不可复位的寰枢椎脱位。临床结果采用日本骨科协会颈椎病评分系统(JOA评分)的标准进行评估。对手术技术、结果、发病率和死亡率进行了评估。结果:女性3例,男性2例;年龄在10y-50y之间)。严重不稳定的原因是创伤(2名患者),而其他3名患者分别患有唐氏综合征、类风湿性关节炎和结核后感染。5例患者均有椎体束压迫表现。随访结束时(平均18m),术前平均JOA评分从13.2±1标准差提高到15.9±0.2标准差(p=0.04),平均恢复率为69%±12%标准差,平均斜坡管角度从119.8°±3.7°增加到135.2°±7°(p=0.04),双侧小关节牵引和移植的平均额外时间和失血量分别约为65m(p=0.004)和72.5ml。无死亡、椎动脉损伤、脑脊液渗漏或结构失败。结论:双侧寰枢椎后小关节撑开并放置垫片是一种安全有效的辅助手术,可减少复杂性寰枢椎不稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信