The Relationship Between the Global Mean Deep‐Sea and Surface Temperature During the Early Eocene

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Barbara Goudsmit‐Harzevoort, A. Lansu, M. Baatsen, A. S. von der Heydt, N. D. de Winter, Yurui Zhang, A. Abe‐Ouchi, A. D. de Boer, W. Chan, Y. Donnadieu, D. Hutchinson, G. Knorr, J. Ladant, P. Morozova, I. Niezgodzki, S. Steinig, A. Tripati, Zhongshi Zhang, Jiang Zhu, M. Ziegler
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Global Mean Deep‐Sea and Surface Temperature During the Early Eocene","authors":"Barbara Goudsmit‐Harzevoort, A. Lansu, M. Baatsen, A. S. von der Heydt, N. D. de Winter, Yurui Zhang, A. Abe‐Ouchi, A. D. de Boer, W. Chan, Y. Donnadieu, D. Hutchinson, G. Knorr, J. Ladant, P. Morozova, I. Niezgodzki, S. Steinig, A. Tripati, Zhongshi Zhang, Jiang Zhu, M. Ziegler","doi":"10.1029/2022PA004532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Estimates of global mean near‐surface air temperature (global SAT) for the Cenozoic era rely largely on paleo‐proxy data of deep‐sea temperature (DST), with the assumption that changes in global SAT covary with changes in the global mean deep‐sea temperature (global DST) and global mean sea‐surface temperature (global SST). We tested the validity of this assumption by analyzing the relationship between global SST, SAT, and DST using 25 different model simulations from the Deep‐Time Model Intercomparison Project simulating the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO) with varying CO2 levels. Similar to the modern situation, we find limited spatial variability in DST, indicating that local DST estimates can be regarded as a first order representative of global DST. In line with previously assumed relationships, linear regression analysis indicates that both global DST and SAT respond stronger to changes in atmospheric CO2 than global SST by a similar factor. Consequently, this model‐based analysis validates the assumption that changes in global DST can be used to estimate changes in global SAT during the early Cenozoic. Paleo‐proxy estimates of global DST, SST, and SAT during EECO show the best fit with model simulations with a 1,680 ppm atmospheric CO2 level. This matches paleo‐proxies of EECO atmospheric CO2, indicating a good fit between models and proxy‐data.","PeriodicalId":54239,"journal":{"name":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2022PA004532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Estimates of global mean near‐surface air temperature (global SAT) for the Cenozoic era rely largely on paleo‐proxy data of deep‐sea temperature (DST), with the assumption that changes in global SAT covary with changes in the global mean deep‐sea temperature (global DST) and global mean sea‐surface temperature (global SST). We tested the validity of this assumption by analyzing the relationship between global SST, SAT, and DST using 25 different model simulations from the Deep‐Time Model Intercomparison Project simulating the early Eocene Climatic Optimum (EECO) with varying CO2 levels. Similar to the modern situation, we find limited spatial variability in DST, indicating that local DST estimates can be regarded as a first order representative of global DST. In line with previously assumed relationships, linear regression analysis indicates that both global DST and SAT respond stronger to changes in atmospheric CO2 than global SST by a similar factor. Consequently, this model‐based analysis validates the assumption that changes in global DST can be used to estimate changes in global SAT during the early Cenozoic. Paleo‐proxy estimates of global DST, SST, and SAT during EECO show the best fit with model simulations with a 1,680 ppm atmospheric CO2 level. This matches paleo‐proxies of EECO atmospheric CO2, indicating a good fit between models and proxy‐data.
早始新世全球平均深海与地表温度的关系
对新生代全球近地表平均气温(全球SAT)的估计在很大程度上依赖于深海温度(DST)的古代理数据,假设全球SAT的变化与全球深海平均温度(全球DST)和全球海表平均温度(世界SST)的变化一致。我们通过分析全球SST、SAT和DST之间的关系来测试这一假设的有效性,使用了来自深时模型相互比较项目的25种不同模型模拟,模拟了不同CO2水平的始新世早期气候最佳值(EECO)。与现代情况类似,我们发现夏令时的空间变异性有限,这表明局部夏令时估计可以被视为全球夏令时的一阶代表。根据先前假设的关系,线性回归分析表明,全球夏令时和SAT对大气CO2变化的响应都比全球SST更强,其响应因子相似。因此,这一基于模型的分析验证了全球夏令时的变化可用于估计新生代早期全球SAT变化的假设。EECO期间全球夏令时、SST和SAT的古代理估计与大气CO2水平为1680ppm的模型模拟最为吻合。这与EECO大气CO2的古代理相匹配,表明模型和代理数据之间具有良好的拟合性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology
Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Atmospheric Science
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology (PALO) publishes papers dealing with records of past environments, biota and climate. Understanding of the Earth system as it was in the past requires the employment of a wide range of approaches including marine and lacustrine sedimentology and speleothems; ice sheet formation and flow; stable isotope, trace element, and organic geochemistry; paleontology and molecular paleontology; evolutionary processes; mineralization in organisms; understanding tree-ring formation; seismic stratigraphy; physical, chemical, and biological oceanography; geochemical, climate and earth system modeling, and many others. The scope of this journal is regional to global, rather than local, and includes studies of any geologic age (Precambrian to Quaternary, including modern analogs). Within this framework, papers on the following topics are to be included: chronology, stratigraphy (where relevant to correlation of paleoceanographic events), paleoreconstructions, paleoceanographic modeling, paleocirculation (deep, intermediate, and shallow), paleoclimatology (e.g., paleowinds and cryosphere history), global sediment and geochemical cycles, anoxia, sea level changes and effects, relations between biotic evolution and paleoceanography, biotic crises, paleobiology (e.g., ecology of “microfossils” used in paleoceanography), techniques and approaches in paleoceanographic inferences, and modern paleoceanographic analogs, and quantitative and integrative analysis of coupled ocean-atmosphere-biosphere processes. Paleoceanographic and Paleoclimate studies enable us to use the past in order to gain information on possible future climatic and biotic developments: the past is the key to the future, just as much and maybe more than the present is the key to the past.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信