The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q2 Social Sciences
Michael D. Murray
{"title":"The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric","authors":"Michael D. Murray","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3040952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Legal Education, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019) \n \nVisual briefs and other forms of visual rhetoric in legal communication may eventually become the norm in legal practice because of the enormous communicative and rhetorical power of visual media. Brain science demonstrates that visual devices work rapidly, almost immediately, to communicate ideas and attain the audience’s adherence to the meaning and truth of the ideas communicated, and thus to persuade the audience of the truth and propriety of the speaker’s communication. Visual representation is also associated with greater perception, comprehension, and retention of information. Visual imagery is not only faster than words, it is better than words. \n \nLaw students and lawyers should be aware that the tool of visual rhetoric is very sharp, and because of the audience’s pre-cognitive and cognitive brain functions in interpreting and understanding the message of visual works, which often process and draw meaning, reactions, and motivations from images without active “thinking,” the sharpness cuts in multiple directions. These attributes require special attention so as to avoid intentional or inadvertent misleading of the audience when using visual rhetorical devices. \n \nThis Article offers guidance with regard to: \n \n(A) the analysis of when to use or not use a visual rhetorical device; \n \n(B) the concept of mise en scene and the manipulation of visual devices; \n \n(C) the decision to use color or not to use color; and \n \n(D) the advisability of focus groups, and testing a visual device before a wider and more diverse test audience.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3040952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Journal of Legal Education, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019) Visual briefs and other forms of visual rhetoric in legal communication may eventually become the norm in legal practice because of the enormous communicative and rhetorical power of visual media. Brain science demonstrates that visual devices work rapidly, almost immediately, to communicate ideas and attain the audience’s adherence to the meaning and truth of the ideas communicated, and thus to persuade the audience of the truth and propriety of the speaker’s communication. Visual representation is also associated with greater perception, comprehension, and retention of information. Visual imagery is not only faster than words, it is better than words. Law students and lawyers should be aware that the tool of visual rhetoric is very sharp, and because of the audience’s pre-cognitive and cognitive brain functions in interpreting and understanding the message of visual works, which often process and draw meaning, reactions, and motivations from images without active “thinking,” the sharpness cuts in multiple directions. These attributes require special attention so as to avoid intentional or inadvertent misleading of the audience when using visual rhetorical devices. This Article offers guidance with regard to: (A) the analysis of when to use or not use a visual rhetorical device; (B) the concept of mise en scene and the manipulation of visual devices; (C) the decision to use color or not to use color; and (D) the advisability of focus groups, and testing a visual device before a wider and more diverse test audience.
工具箱中最锋利的工具:视觉法律修辞
《法律教育杂志》,第68卷,第1期(2019)由于视觉媒体的巨大传播力和修辞力,法律传播中的视觉简报和其他形式的视觉修辞最终可能成为法律实践中的规范。脑科学表明,视觉设备可以快速、几乎立即地传达想法,让观众坚持所传达想法的含义和真实性,从而说服观众相信说话者沟通的真实性和恰当性。视觉表现也与更好的感知、理解和保留信息有关。视觉图像不仅比文字快,而且比文字好。法律专业的学生和律师应该意识到,视觉修辞的工具是非常敏锐的,由于观众在解释和理解视觉作品信息时的前认知和认知大脑功能,通常在没有主动“思考”的情况下从图像中处理和提取意义、反应和动机,因此其敏锐性是多个方向的。这些属性需要特别注意,以避免在使用视觉修辞手段时有意或无意地误导观众。这篇文章提供了以下方面的指导:(A)分析何时使用或不使用视觉修辞手段;(B) 场景的概念和视觉设备的操作;(C) 决定是否使用颜色;以及(D)焦点小组的可取性,以及在更广泛、更多样化的测试受众面前测试视觉设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Legal Education
Journal of Legal Education Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信