‘Trapped in the trap’: Exploring Music Therapists’ clinical engagement with the current discourse around UK Drill

IF 0.7 Q4 REHABILITATION
Joe Smith-Sands
{"title":"‘Trapped in the trap’: Exploring Music Therapists’ clinical engagement with the current discourse around UK Drill","authors":"Joe Smith-Sands","doi":"10.1177/13594575221119569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates Music Therapists’ experience and understanding of UK Drill. As a recently emerged sub-genre of Rap, its graphic lyrics have been linked to increases in gang activity and violent crime in the United Kingdom, while simultaneously voicing the experiences of marginalised black, working-class people. This has fuelled wider debate around censorship and diversity, tensions within which are explored in this article in a review of the literature on Rap and music therapy. The review suggests that while the therapeutic use of UK Drill may be contraindicated, to exclude the genre from music therapy is problematic from a socio-political perspective. This debate is then explored through semi-structured interviews with two white Music Therapists with experience of working with young people who want to use UK Drill in their music therapy sessions. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Three themes are discussed: research participants’ descriptions of their perception of the therapeutic components of UK Drill, their perspectives on the psychosocial context of UK Drill and their negotiating questions of identity when working with UK Drill. Findings suggested a complex role for UK Drill in music therapy. While the ethical and clinical necessity of not excluding UK Drill from sessions was established, so were a number of challenges posed for Music Therapists looking to integrate it into their practice. Research participants were also found to be emotionally desensitised to UK Drill’s graphic lyrics. This is argued to represent an underlying anxiety towards UK Drill’s intense emotional expression, which was further suggested by the absence of open consideration towards clients’ racial identities. The findings are considered in the context of wider diversity issues within the profession. They also signal the need for a more socially cognisant music therapy practice, with greater open consideration paid towards the client’s racial identity by white Music Therapists.","PeriodicalId":42422,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Music Therapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"94 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13594575221119569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article investigates Music Therapists’ experience and understanding of UK Drill. As a recently emerged sub-genre of Rap, its graphic lyrics have been linked to increases in gang activity and violent crime in the United Kingdom, while simultaneously voicing the experiences of marginalised black, working-class people. This has fuelled wider debate around censorship and diversity, tensions within which are explored in this article in a review of the literature on Rap and music therapy. The review suggests that while the therapeutic use of UK Drill may be contraindicated, to exclude the genre from music therapy is problematic from a socio-political perspective. This debate is then explored through semi-structured interviews with two white Music Therapists with experience of working with young people who want to use UK Drill in their music therapy sessions. Data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Three themes are discussed: research participants’ descriptions of their perception of the therapeutic components of UK Drill, their perspectives on the psychosocial context of UK Drill and their negotiating questions of identity when working with UK Drill. Findings suggested a complex role for UK Drill in music therapy. While the ethical and clinical necessity of not excluding UK Drill from sessions was established, so were a number of challenges posed for Music Therapists looking to integrate it into their practice. Research participants were also found to be emotionally desensitised to UK Drill’s graphic lyrics. This is argued to represent an underlying anxiety towards UK Drill’s intense emotional expression, which was further suggested by the absence of open consideration towards clients’ racial identities. The findings are considered in the context of wider diversity issues within the profession. They also signal the need for a more socially cognisant music therapy practice, with greater open consideration paid towards the client’s racial identity by white Music Therapists.
“被困在陷阱中”:探索音乐治疗师与当前围绕英国钻探的话语的临床参与
本文调查了音乐治疗师对UK Drill的经验和理解。作为最近出现的说唱亚流派,其图形歌词与英国帮派活动和暴力犯罪的增加有关,同时表达了被边缘化的黑人工人阶级的经历。这引发了围绕审查制度和多样性的更广泛辩论,本文在对说唱和音乐治疗文献的综述中探讨了其中的紧张关系。该综述表明,虽然UK Drill的治疗用途可能是禁忌的,但从社会政治角度来看,将该流派排除在音乐治疗之外是有问题的。然后,通过对两位白人音乐治疗师的半结构化采访来探讨这场辩论,他们有与希望在音乐治疗课程中使用UK Drill的年轻人合作的经验。使用解释现象学分析对数据进行分析。讨论了三个主题:研究参与者对英国训练的治疗成分的描述,他们对英国训练心理社会背景的看法,以及他们在与英国训练合作时的身份谈判问题。研究结果表明,UK Drill在音乐治疗中扮演着复杂的角色。虽然不将UK Drill排除在课程之外的伦理和临床必要性已经确立,但对于希望将其融入实践的音乐治疗师来说,也存在许多挑战。研究人员还发现,参与者对UK Drill的图形歌词在情感上不敏感。这被认为代表了对UK Drill强烈情感表达的潜在焦虑,而对客户种族身份缺乏公开考虑进一步表明了这一点。这些调查结果是在行业内更广泛的多样性问题的背景下考虑的。它们还表明,需要一种更具社会认知的音乐治疗实践,白人音乐治疗师对客户的种族身份给予更大的公开考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
42.90%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信